Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 603918.SS Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech Co., Ltd. Class A603918.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Packaged Software
Momentum weak 36
Mkt cap
$530M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
75%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$16.2M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
36.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-5.8 pp
WACC 7.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥9.75
1D-3.6%
1W+6.9%
1M-4.3%
3M-12.6%
6M-27.2%
YTD-37.9%
1Y-41.9%
ATR %5.1%
52w lowhigh56.0% off high

What Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech does

Employees: 790

Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech at a glance

Size Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech (603918.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $530M, the 3723rd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥9.75 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 27.2%, against -21.3% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 14.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.7%); the operating margin is -8.8% (peer median 2.1%).

Valuation It trades at 36.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 23.0× (2nd most expensive of 11).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.8 points below its cost of capital (7.1% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 77603918.SS 72
Six months, rebased to 100: Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥655MCN¥690MCN¥697MCN¥930MCN¥860M
Revenue growth—-1%-25%+8%—
Gross profitCN¥214MCN¥162MCN¥161MCN¥261MCN¥251M
EBITDAn/aCN¥15.0M-CN¥8.12MCN¥77.3MCN¥44.7M
Net income-CN¥58.4M-CN¥57.2M-CN¥60.8MCN¥25.6MCN¥17.9M
Free cash flow-CN¥7.35M-CN¥1.21MCN¥36.2M-CN¥9.66MCN¥50.7M
Capital expenditureCN¥58.3MCN¥55.5MCN¥51.9MCN¥76.5MCN¥61.3M
Total debtCN¥61.2MCN¥49.4MCN¥59.9MCN¥76.6MCN¥52.8M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-40%-20%0%271807773673301221ACAST3477007595688588IVU3003529890301157300399300571TOM2RZLVBRUN300550002995STYL603918.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%+300%0×20×40×07773673301221ACAST3477007595IVU9890TOM2STYL603918.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech is the large dot.

Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech competitors and peer comparison

How Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure603918.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.3%-5.9%8th highest of 21
6-month return-27.2%-21.3%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-56.0%-47.4%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-14.7%+5.7%3rd lowest of 20
Operating margin-8.8%2.1%7th lowest of 21
Forward P/E36.1×23.0×2nd most expensive of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital-5.8 pp-9.5 pp9th highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech 603918.SSChina$530M-27%-15%-9%36.1×n/an/a
Mininglamp Technology 2718.HKHong Kong$533M-89%+9%-6%n/an/an/a
NetDragon Websoft 0777.HKHong Kong$534M-13%-16%13%9.7×-14.5%-6.8%
Broadleaf 3673.TJapan$534M0%+12%13%27.0×6.4%-0.3%
Wuhan KOTEI Informatics 301221.SZChina$526M-22%+11%2%39.3×n/an/a
Acast ACAST.STSweden$526M-20%+23%3%33.0×21.4%+32.5%
Sphere 347700.KSSouth Korea$525M-66%+303%3%32.1×n/an/a
Argo Graphics 7595.TJapan$525M-10%+5%15%14.8×-10.9%+10.5%
Linkage Software 688588.SSChina$541M-21%-10%12%n/a17.6%+10.8%
IVU Traffic Technologies IVU.DEGermany$518M+40%+10%13%28.8×6.8%+10.2%
Beijing VRV Software 300352.SZChina$518M-67%+28%-110%n/a58.4%-13.7%
Tanwan 9890.HKHong Kong$517M-52%-4%-6%2.9×n/an/a
Hangzhou Huasu Technology 301157.SZChina$516M-19%+16%5%n/an/an/a
Jiangxi Tianli Technology 300399.SZChina$514M-21%+6%2%n/an/an/a
Hangzhou Anysoft Information Technology 300571.SZChina$512M-45%-12%-14%n/an/an/a
TomTom TOM2.ASNetherlands$511M-23%-7%12%16.9×-10.1%+1.0%
Rezolve AI RZLVUnited States$550M-45%+2,224%-94%n/an/an/a
Boost Run BRUNUnited States$511M-68%n/a-47%n/a5.3%n/a
Heren Health 300550.SZChina$510M+18%-4%-11%n/a43.2%-0.9%
Beijing Quanshi World Online Network Information 002995.SZChina$508M-15%-19%-13%n/a5.3%-19.1%
Seshaasai Technologies STYL.NSIndia$554M+20%-2%23%19.0×12.2%+7.9%

Questions

Which companies are Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Mininglamp Technology (2718.HK), NetDragon Websoft (0777.HK), Broadleaf (3673.T), Wuhan KOTEI Informatics (301221.SZ), Acast (ACAST.ST), Sphere (347700.KS), Argo Graphics (7595.T), Linkage Software (688588.SS).
Is Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 36.1× against a peer median of 23.0×, 2nd most expensive of 11 in its peer set.
How has Shanghai Golden Bridge Info Tech stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -27.2% against -21.3% for the median peer; over one year -41.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.