Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 603682.SS Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) Co., Ltd. Class A603682.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Real Estate›Real Estate Development
Momentum weak 32
Mkt cap
$568M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
59%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$11.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
66.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 6.4%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥8.01
1D-2.7%
1W+7.5%
1M-12.2%
3M-24.1%
6M-7.4%
YTD+21.6%
1Y+31.5%
ATR %5.9%
52w lowhigh41.1% off high

What Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) does

Employees: 474

Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) at a glance

Size Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) (603682.SS) is a China Real Estate company (Real Estate Development) with a market value of $568M, the 3559th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥8.01 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 7.4%, against -9.3% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 12.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.8%); the operating margin is -14.9% (peer median 26.4%).

Valuation It trades at 66.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.3× (most expensive of 12).

Relative performance

8010012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026603682.SS 93Peer median 89
Six months, rebased to 100: Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥910MCN¥942MCN¥1.00BCN¥1.02BCN¥876M
Revenue growth—-6%-2%+17%—
Gross profitCN¥232MCN¥221MCN¥252MCN¥283MCN¥347M
EBITDACN¥369MCN¥659MCN¥679MCN¥700MCN¥740M
Net income-CN¥171M-CN¥119MCN¥14.8MCN¥98.8MCN¥97.0M
Free cash flowCN¥579MCN¥604MCN¥653MCN¥617MCN¥533M
Capital expenditureCN¥20.5MCN¥42.4MCN¥77.8MCN¥29.6MCN¥54.8M
Total debtCN¥3.15BCN¥3.40BCN¥3.84BCN¥3.74BCN¥3.43B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-30%-20%-10%0%+10%-10%0%ECH8841EMIL-B0008820028600658025812248818MLGH30KALPATARUSTEF-B0005266177DRM0119NIRLONCTY1S600684603682.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×20×40×60×ECH8841EMIL-B8818MLG0005266177CTY1S600684603682.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) is the large dot.

Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) competitors and peer comparison

How Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure603682.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.2%-5.9%6th lowest of 21
6-month return-7.4%-9.3%7th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-41.1%-25.8%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-12.8%+7.8%5th lowest of 21
Operating margin-14.9%26.4%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E66.8×11.3×most expensive of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) 603682.SSChina$568M-7%-13%-15%66.8×n/an/a
Echo Investment ECH.WAPoland$569M+11%+120%19%10.1×n/an/a
TOC 8841.TJapan$569M-9%+15%19%27.3×n/an/a
Fastighetsbolaget Emilshus EMIL-B.STSweden$565M-23%+31%74%14.1×n/an/a
Beijing Hualian Department Store 000882.SZChina$571M-16%-21%-18%n/an/an/a
Tian An China Investments 0028.HKHong Kong$577M-30%-65%9%n/an/an/a
Beijing Electronic Zone High-tech 600658.SSChina$577M-33%-21%-163%n/an/an/a
Tomson 0258.HKHong Kong$578M-16%-73%44%n/an/an/a
C C Land 1224.HKHong Kong$579M-2%+14%40%n/an/an/a
Keihanshin Building 8818.TJapan$553M-3%+2%25%12.3×n/an/a
MLP MLG.WAPoland$588M-5%+20%48%9.5×n/an/a
Hong Fok H30.SISingapore$590M-8%-1%43%n/an/an/a
Kalpataru KALPATARU.NSIndia$541M-33%+27%2%n/an/an/a
Stendoerren Fastigheter STEF-B.STSweden$540M-9%+14%72%14.0×n/an/a
Xueda (Xiamen) Education Technology 000526.SZChina$539M-15%+12%12%10.9×n/an/a
DA-LI DEVELOPMENT 6177.TWTaiwan$599M-8%+94%31%5.0×n/an/a
DREAM Unlimited DRM.TOCanada$532M-9%+11%28%11.3×n/an/a
Poly Property 0119.HKHong Kong$531M-53%0%5%n/an/an/a
Nirlon NIRLON.NSIndia$611M+9%+5%69%n/an/an/a
Citycon CTY1S.HEFinland$612M+1%-2%59%4.8×n/an/a
Guangzhou Pearl River Development 600684.SSChina$524M-29%+4%6%39.5×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group)'s closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Echo Investment (ECH.WA), TOC (8841.T), Fastighetsbolaget Emilshus (EMIL-B.ST), Beijing Hualian Department Store (000882.SZ), Tian An China Investments (0028.HK), Beijing Electronic Zone High-tech (600658.SS), Tomson (0258.HK), C C Land (1224.HK).
Is Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 66.8× against a peer median of 11.3×, most expensive of 12 in its peer set.
How has Shanghai Golden Union Commercial Management (Group) stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -7.4% against -9.3% for the median peer; over one year +31.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.