Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 601233.SS Tongkun Group Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Tongkun Group Co., Ltd. Class A601233.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Textiles

Major Chinese producer of PTA and polyester filament, a key raw material for textiles.

≈ A Chinese Indorama Ventures for polyester feedstockMomentum leader 86
Mkt cap
$8.35B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
57%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$103M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
6.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+1.7 pp
WACC 6.8%
Hurdle
-17 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
171 days
26 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥23.37
1D-4.2%
1W+13.4%
1M+3.0%
3M+4.2%
6M-3.5%
YTD+35.8%
1Y+63.5%
ATR %5.0%
52w lowhigh16.8% off high

What Tongkun does

Major Chinese producer of PTA and polyester filament, a key raw material for textiles.

Earns the spread between polyester filament prices and the cost of PTA and the oil-based inputs behind it, so profit swings with that spread and with textile demand. It makes much of its own PTA, avoiding buying it at market prices. Private Tongkun Group is the controlling shareholder.

In one line: A Chinese Indorama Ventures for polyester feedstock.

Products and services

  • PTA (purified terephthalic acid)
  • Polyester filament/POY

Customers

  • Textile/fabric weavers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Petrochemicals
  • PTA & polyester filament

What could go right

  • Textile/polyester demand growth

What could go wrong

  • Overcapacity/price competition in PTA-polyester chain
  • Feedstock (PX/crude) cost volatility

Moat: narrow (scale, cost advantage). Large integrated PTA-to-polyester capacity gives cost scale in a commoditized feedstock market.

Headquarters: Tongxiang, China · Founded: 1994 · Employees: 33,639

Named competitors

Tongkun at a glance

Size Tongkun (601233.SS) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Textiles) with a market value of $8.35B, the 299th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥23.37 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 3.5%, against -24.1% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 11 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 20.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.3%); the operating margin is 5.0% (peer median 9.3%).

Valuation It trades at 6.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.3× (2nd cheapest of 11).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.7 points above its cost of capital (6.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026601233.SS 98Peer median 75
Six months, rebased to 100: Tongkun against the median of its 10 peers (local-currency closes).

Tongkun financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥112BCN¥93.8BCN¥101BCN¥82.3BCN¥61.8B
Revenue growth—-7%+23%+33%—
Gross profitCN¥13.7BCN¥4.89BCN¥4.46BCN¥3.68BCN¥1.66B
EBITDAn/aCN¥6.78BCN¥6.10BCN¥4.38BCN¥1.45B
Net incomeCN¥7.39BCN¥2.03BCN¥1.20BCN¥797MCN¥125M
Free cash flowCN¥4.31B-CN¥4.40BCN¥794M-CN¥8.21B-CN¥14.0B
Capital expenditureCN¥6.11BCN¥10.8BCN¥8.99BCN¥11.4BCN¥15.0B
Total debtCN¥60.5BCN¥60.9BCN¥54.8BCN¥53.1BCN¥42.9B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Tongkun competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%00208000070300206460325634026002956032253110603306COA601233.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Tongkun is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%20×40×60×0020800007030020646032563402600295603225603306COA601233.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Tongkun is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%0007030020643402600295603225603306COA601233.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Tongkun is the large dot.

Tongkun competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (601233.SS vs 000703.SZ vs 002493.SZ vs 600346.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Tongkun 601233.SS$8.35B-3%+21%5%6.8×-1.4%
Hengyi Petrochemical 000703.SZ$7.21B-30%+21%9%5.0×-6.6%
Rongsheng Petrochemical 002493.SZ$17.9B-14%-11%8%12.2×-4.4%
Hengli Petrochemical 600346.SS$17.5B-25%-8%8%9.2×-8.0%
Xinfengming 603225.SS$4.54B-2%+22%4%9.7×-3.9%
Jiangsu Sanfame Polyester Material 600370.SS$857M-44%-13%-3%n/an/a
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical 600688.SS$3.75B-5%-4%0%59.0×n/a

How Tongkun compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Tongkun against its 10 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure601233.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+3.0%-14.8%3rd highest of 11
6-month return-3.5%-24.1%4th highest of 11
Distance from 52-week high-16.8%-36.1%3rd highest of 11
Revenue growth (TTM)+20.8%+12.3%3rd highest of 11
Operating margin5.0%9.3%3rd lowest of 11
Forward P/E6.8×15.3×2nd cheapest of 11
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-1.4%-0.3%4th least demanding of 8
Growth delivered (Del g)+15.4%+6.5%2nd highest of 8
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-16.8 pp-10.8 pp2nd least demanding of 8
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.7 pp+0.7 pp6th highest of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Tongkun 601233.SSChina$8.35B-3%+21%5%6.8×-1.4%+15.4%
Sinoma Science & Technology 002080.SZChina$8.76B-40%+18%9%19.5×n/an/a
Hengyi Petrochemical 000703.SZChina$7.21B-30%+21%9%5.0×-6.6%+5.6%
Huafon Chemical 002064.SZChina$7.15B-18%+13%14%12.0×-0.3%+10.5%
Grace Fabric Technology 603256.SSChina$10.6B-36%+115%44%57.2×n/an/a
Toray Industries 3402.TJapan$11.1B+6%+6%6%16.6×5.5%+6.5%
Inner Mongolia ERDOS Resources 600295.SSChina$5.49B-5%+2%9%14.1×-9.2%+2.2%
Xinfengming 603225.SSChina$4.54B-2%+22%4%9.7×-3.9%+14.1%
Nitto Boseki 3110.TJapan$2.85B-58%+12%20%19.3×n/an/a
HMT (Xiamen) New Technical Materials 603306.SSChina$2.18B-56%-1%0%57.4×50.6%+21.4%
Coats COA.LUnited Kingdom$2.14B+2%+5%15%11.2×11.6%+4.1%

Questions

Who are Tongkun's main competitors?
Named competitors: Hengyi Petrochemical (000703.SZ), Rongsheng Petrochemical (002493.SZ), Hengli Petrochemical (600346.SS), Xinfengming Group (603225.SS), Jiangsu Sanfangxiang (600370.SS), Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical (600688.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Sinoma Science & Technology (002080.SZ), Hengyi Petrochemical (000703.SZ), Huafon Chemical (002064.SZ), Grace Fabric Technology (603256.SS), Toray Industries (3402.T), Inner Mongolia ERDOS Resources (600295.SS).
Is Tongkun expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 6.8× against a peer median of 15.3×, 2nd cheapest of 11 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Tongkun stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -3.5% against -24.1% for the median peer; over one year +63.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.