Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 600938.SS CNOOC Limited Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

CNOOC Limited Class A600938.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Energy›Integrated Oil

China's dominant offshore oil & gas producer, exploring and producing crude oil and natural gas from Chinese and overseas waters.

≈ China's Occidental Petroleum, focused offshoreMomentum neutral 57
Mkt cap
$141B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$285M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+19.0 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-42 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
146 days
1 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥31.28
1D+1.0%
1W-13.0%
1M-8.5%
3M-1.8%
6M-21.8%
YTD+3.6%
1Y+13.8%
ATR %3.8%
52w lowhigh29.8% off high

What CNOOC does

China's dominant offshore oil & gas producer, exploring and producing crude oil and natural gas from Chinese and overseas waters.

Earns by selling the crude oil and gas it produces offshore at world-linked prices, with little downstream business of its own, so profit follows the oil price and its low unit costs. State-owned CNOOC Group holds most of the shares. It added a Shanghai listing in 2022 alongside its Hong Kong one.

In one line: China's Occidental Petroleum, focused offshore.

Products and services

  • Offshore crude oil production
  • Offshore natural gas production
  • Overseas E&P assets

Customers

  • Domestic refiners/utilities
  • Global oil/gas buyers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy
  • Offshore oil & gas E&P
  • Exploration & production

What could go right

  • China offshore reserve growth and low production costs
  • Global oil price upside

What could go wrong

  • Global oil price cycles
  • Geopolitical/overseas asset exposure

Moat: wide (regulatory licence, scale). Exclusive state licence for offshore China oil/gas exploration gives a structural domestic monopoly position.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Founded: 1982 · Employees: 20,810

Named competitors

CNOOC at a glance

Size CNOOC (600938.SS) is a China Energy company (Integrated Oil) with a market value of $141B, the 12th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥31.28 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 21.8%, against +6.8% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 16 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +17.6%); the operating margin is 45.6% (peer median 20.9%).

Valuation It trades at 9.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 7.7× (6th most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -22% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +21%, so the hurdle is -42 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 19.0 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 107600938.SS 82
Six months, rebased to 100: CNOOC against the median of its 15 peers (local-currency closes).

CNOOC financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥423BCN¥396BCN¥412BCN¥407BCN¥398B
Revenue growth—-4%+1%+2%—
Gross profitCN¥230BCN¥209BCN¥232BCN¥213BCN¥229B
EBITDACN¥280BCN¥261BCN¥273BCN¥249BCN¥266B
Net incomeCN¥138BCN¥122BCN¥138BCN¥124BCN¥142B
Free cash flowCN¥132BCN¥99.5BCN¥98.3BCN¥92.3BCN¥112B
Capital expenditureCN¥113BCN¥112BCN¥123BCN¥121BCN¥94.8B
Total debtn/aCN¥69.8BCN¥91.9BCN¥120BCN¥134B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

CNOOC competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%0%PBRBPEQNRCNQTTEEOG601857IMOOXYCVECVXDVNREP600938.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. CNOOC is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%5×7.5×10×12.5×PBRBPEQNRCNQTTESUEOGSHEL601857IMOOXYCVECVXDVNREP600938.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. CNOOC is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%PBRBPEQNRCNQSUEOGSHEL601857IMOOXYCVECVXDVNREP600938.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. CNOOC is the large dot.

CNOOC competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (600938.SS vs 601857.SS vs 600028.SS vs XOM)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
CNOOC 600938.SS$141B-22%+7%46%9.0×-21.8%
PetroChina 601857.SS$336B+4%-3%9%12.1×-5.1%
China Petroleum & Chemical 600028.SS$99.2B+8%-10%2%15.8×9.0%
ExxonMobil XOM$677B+16%+21%14%11.8×-5.9%
ConocoPhillips COP$164B+21%+9%22%11.5×-6.2%

How CNOOC compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

CNOOC against its 15 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure600938.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-8.5%-0.9%4th lowest of 16
6-month return-21.8%+6.8%lowest of 16
Distance from 52-week high-29.8%-12.4%2nd lowest of 16
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.5%+17.6%4th lowest of 16
Operating margin45.6%20.9%highest of 16
Forward P/E9.0×7.7×6th most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-21.8%-11.7%least demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+20.6%+14.3%4th highest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-42.4 pp-26.4 pp2nd least demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital+19.0 pp+11.9 pp2nd highest of 16
EV / EBITDA2.5×5.1×2nd cheapest of 16
Net debt / EBITDA-0.9×0.5×least indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
CNOOC 600938.SSChina$141B-22%+7%46%9.0×-21.8%+20.6%
Petroleo Brasileiro SA Sponsored ADR PBRUnited States$118B-9%+21%35%3.7×-19.8%+11.0%
Bp PLC BP..LUnited Kingdom$116B+2%+23%13%5.4×-16.3%+11.7%
Equinor EQNR.OLNorway$102B+12%+2%33%7.2×-15.4%+20.7%
Canadian Natural Resources CNQ.TOCanada$101B+12%+18%27%10.3×2.8%+18.1%
TotalEnergies TTE.PAFrance$200B+2%+11%17%7.0×-15.6%+9.0%
Suncor Energy SU.TOCanada$81.0B+12%+27%24%8.6×-11.7%+14.7%
EOG Resources EOGUnited States$77.2B+13%+17%35%8.3×-13.5%+17.9%
Shell SHEL.LUnited Kingdom$284B+18%+15%16%7.7×-10.9%+8.1%
PetroChina 601857.SSChina$336B+4%-3%9%12.1×-5.1%+8.6%
Imperial Oil IMO.TOCanada$59.5B+3%+19%14%10.5×-0.2%+17.1%
Occidental Petroleum OXYUnited States$56.4B+7%-11%23%9.1×-2.5%+4.7%
Cenovus Energy CVE.TOCanada$50.2B0%+12%21%6.7×-14.4%+29.7%
Chevron CVXUnited States$415B+18%+22%15%11.4×-3.0%+14.3%
Devon Energy DVNUnited States$46.4B-7%+18%24%7.6×0.9%+31.5%
Repsol REP.MCSpain$36.2B+34%+24%13%4.7×-20.1%+10.5%

Questions

Who are CNOOC's main competitors?
Named competitors: PetroChina (601857.SS), Sinopec (600028.SS), ExxonMobil (XOM), ConocoPhillips (COP). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Petroleo Brasileiro SA Sponsored ADR (PBR), Bp PLC (BP..L), Equinor (EQNR.OL), Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ.TO), TotalEnergies (TTE.PA), Suncor Energy (SU.TO).
Is CNOOC expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.0× against a peer median of 7.7×, 6th most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -22% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +21%, so the hurdle is -42 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has CNOOC stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -21.8% against +6.8% for the median peer; over one year +13.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.