Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 5386.TWO Albatron Technology Co., LtdOpen in the cockpit ↗

Albatron Technology Co., Ltd5386.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Information Technology›Electronic Production Equipment
Momentum laggard 13
Mkt cap
$310M
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$4.30M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+28.1 pp
WACC 10.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · TWDNT$189.50
1D-1.8%
1W-18.0%
1M-34.8%
3M-23.7%
6M-35.0%
YTD+210.7%
1Y+312.6%
ATR %7.8%
52w lowhigh54.7% off high

What Albatron Technology does

No business profile yet.

Albatron Technology at a glance

Size Albatron Technology (5386.TWO) is a Taiwan Information Technology company (Electronic Production Equipment) with a market value of $310M, the 642nd largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$189.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 35.0%, against -15.2% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 223.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.6%); the operating margin is 17.8% (peer median 5.8%).

Valuation It trades at 0.8× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.3× (6th cheapest of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 28.1 points above its cost of capital (10.0% WACC).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 835386.TWO 60
Six months, rebased to 100: Albatron Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Albatron Technology financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$18.5BNT$5.88BNT$4.44BNT$1.97BNT$3.12B
Revenue growth—+33%+125%-37%—
Gross profitNT$4.01BNT$602MNT$255MNT$165MNT$178M
EBITDANT$3.30BNT$438MNT$147MNT$92.4MNT$90.1M
Net incomeNT$2.55BNT$310MNT$103MNT$65.2MNT$50.8M
Free cash flow-NT$3.62B-NT$965M-NT$1.26BNT$112MNT$798M
Capital expenditureNT$429,000NT$300,000NT$2.85MNT$2.07MNT$892,000
Total debtNT$4.17BNT$2.11BNT$986MNT$60.0MNT$20.0M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Albatron Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-20%BN249163006150710690530054307835080963004603701F3C6387362400219904510000272967791970248434165386.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Albatron Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%0×2×4×BN2491630061569053005430783503004603701F3C638736240021990451000027296779197024845386.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Albatron Technology is the large dot.

Albatron Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Albatron Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Albatron Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure5386.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-34.8%-18.8%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-35.0%-15.2%2nd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-54.7%-41.0%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+223.0%+12.6%highest of 21
Operating margin17.8%5.8%3rd highest of 21
EV / Sales0.8×2.3×6th cheapest of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+28.1 pp-1.4 pp2nd highest of 20
EV / EBITDA4.2×10.3×2nd cheapest of 13
Net debt / EBITDA1.1×-2.3×3rd most indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Albatron Technology 5386.TWOTaiwan$310M-35%+223%18%0.8×n/an/a
Valuetronics BN2.SISingapore$311M-17%-8%8%0.7×-12.4%-7.4%
PARPRO 4916.TWTaiwan$308M+28%+32%9%2.3×n/an/a
XDC Industries (Shenzhen) 300615.SZChina$304M-21%+35%-12%3.5×n/an/a
BOE Varitronix 0710.HKHong Kong$321M-27%+3%2%n/an/an/a
Cosel 6905.TJapan$297M-10%+17%1%0.7×30.1%-1.5%
Shenzhen Longood Intelligent Electronic 300543.SZChina$329M-26%+2%-1%1.2×n/an/a
Hanyang Digitech 078350.KSSouth Korea$291M-13%+38%5%0.5×n/an/a
CoAsia Electronics 8096.TWOTaiwan$285M-35%+16%2%0.5×n/an/a
Guangdong Faith Long Crystal Technology 300460.SZChina$339M-14%+11%-18%4.5×9.5%+7.2%
FIC Global 3701.TWTaiwan$341M-29%-28%-6%1.6×31.2%+5.8%
SFC Energy F3C.DEGermany$343M-16%+3%13%1.8×8.9%+21.9%
SAMCO 6387.TJapan$280M-53%+16%28%3.2×5.8%+13.4%
Viking Tech 3624.TWOTaiwan$344M+77%+14%12%3.4×30.5%+4.7%
Zhejiang East Crystal Electronic 002199.SZChina$352M-6%+202%-5%3.4×n/an/a
Hanyang ENG 045100.KSSouth Korea$268M-29%+11%6%0.1×n/an/a
Hollyland (China) Electronics Technology 002729.SZChina$361M-32%+14%8%4.8×24.2%+20.2%
Nihon Dempa Kogyo 6779.TJapan$259M-2%+8%6%1.0×n/an/a
IMAX China 1970.HKHong Kong$374M+11%-17%36%2.9×-7.2%+14.5%
Siward Crystal Technology 2484.TWTaiwan$257M+25%-1%6%3.1×32.5%-1.4%
Winmate 3416.TWTaiwan$376M-5%+27%18%2.8×-1.8%+14.6%

Questions

Which companies are Albatron Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Valuetronics (BN2.SI), PARPRO (4916.TW), XDC Industries (Shenzhen) (300615.SZ), BOE Varitronix (0710.HK), Cosel (6905.T), Shenzhen Longood Intelligent Electronic (300543.SZ), Hanyang Digitech (078350.KS), CoAsia Electronics (8096.TWO).
Is Albatron Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.8× against a peer median of 2.3×, 6th cheapest of 20 in its peer set.
How has Albatron Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -35.0% against -15.2% for the median peer; over one year +312.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.