Loading…

BML , Inc.4694.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Health Care›Medical/Nursing Services
Momentum strong 68
Mkt cap
$887M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
50%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.07M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.4 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-11 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥3,740
1D-4.7%
1W-0.8%
1M+3.5%
3M+5.8%
6M-2.0%
YTD-3.1%
1Y+3.0%
ATR %2.3%
52w lowhigh14.7% off high

What BML does

Employees: 4,612

BML at a glance

Size BML (4694.T) is a Japan Health Care company (Medical/Nursing Services) with a market value of $887M, the 786th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,740 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 2.0%, against +7.8% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 3.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.9%); the operating margin is 7.0% (peer median 7.9%).

Valuation It trades at 18.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.6× (8th most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is -11 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.4 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1074694.T 100
Six months, rebased to 100: BML against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

BML financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥151B¥150B¥143B¥138B¥159B
Revenue growth—+5%+4%-13%—
Gross profit¥49.3B¥48.7B¥45.9B¥45.6B¥61.4B
EBITDA¥19.8B¥19.5B¥17.1B¥16.0B¥30.3B
Net income¥7.87B¥7.75B¥6.26B¥6.04B¥15.6B
Free cash flown/a¥12.0B¥663M-¥4.57B¥7.18B
Capital expendituren/a¥10.1B¥16.7B¥20.9B¥6.46B
Total debt¥4.68B¥5.72B¥6.19B¥6.18B¥5.07B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

BML competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%0%+20%TTALOTHYROCARE1951AHCODNAWELLREG195940688315GDRXFLGTNEPHROPLUSNUTXPNTGLMRIOPKDIA3010604694.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. BML is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%20×40×TTALOTHYROCARE1951WELLREG195940688315GMRSGDRXNEPHROPLUSNUTXMETROPOLISPNTGLMRIDIA4694.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. BML is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+100%+200%0%100%200%TTALOTHYROCAREAHCOWELL195940GMRSNUTX4694.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. BML is the large dot.

BML competitors and peer comparison

How BML compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

BML against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure4694.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+3.5%-1.1%8th highest of 21
6-month return-2.0%+7.8%8th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-14.7%-22.6%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+3.9%+6.9%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin7.0%7.9%10th lowest of 21
Forward P/E18.6×18.6×8th most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-9.7%11.9%4th least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+1.6%+12.3%2nd lowest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-11.3 pp-0.3 pp6th least demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.4 pp-1.0 pp6th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA4.8×11.3×3rd cheapest of 15
Net debt / EBITDA-2.5×2.6×least indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
BML 4694.TJapan$887M-2%+4%7%18.6×-9.7%+1.6%
Terveystalo Oy TTALO.HEFinland$883M-19%-8%8%11.1×-4.6%+5.3%
Thyrocare Technologies THYROCARE.NSIndia$830M+5%+22%26%35.2×27.9%+10.9%
Jinxin Fertility 1951.HKHong Kong$800M-2%+7%11%24.4×18.0%+12.4%
AdaptHealth AHCOUnited States$1.00B+8%-3%3%n/a16.3%+25.2%
Ginkgo Bioworks DNAUnited States$760M+26%-52%-258%n/an/an/a
WELL Health Technologies WELL.TOCanada$760M-5%+39%7%14.7×9.1%+94.5%
Regis Healthcare REG.AXAustralia$1.05B-17%+17%4%25.1×14.6%+14.4%
HK inno.N 195940.KSSouth Korea$745M-32%+7%12%11.8×-10.8%+12.2%
Novogene 688315.SSChina$1.16B+31%+6%7%35.7×17.1%+8.2%
GMR Solutions GMRSUnited States$672Mn/a-4%14%8.0×-20.0%-4.0%
GoodRx GDRXUnited States$1.20B+20%-2%12%10.4×6.8%+7.7%
Fulgent Genetics FLGTUnited States$653M+49%+7%-36%n/an/an/a
Nephrocare Health Services NEPHROPLUS.NSIndia$639M+10%+33%14%41.9×35.7%+31.6%
Nutex Health NUTXUnited States$1.24B+32%+7%43%7.2×-19.5%+253.5%
Metropolis Healthcare METROPOLIS.NSIndia$1.25B+12%+20%18%45.6×32.4%+10.5%
Pennant PNTGUnited States$1.27B+1%+38%6%24.0×21.1%+19.4%
Lumexa Imaging LMRIUnited States$1.29B+29%+8%3%18.6×n/an/a
OPKO Health OPKUnited States$1.29B+52%-11%-29%n/an/an/a
Diagnostyka DIA.WAPoland$1.29B-5%+19%15%18.4×6.9%+18.9%
Shanghai Labway Clinical Laboratory 301060.SZChina$593M-4%-19%6%n/a8.8%+3.2%

Questions

Which companies are BML's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Terveystalo Oy (TTALO.HE), Thyrocare Technologies (THYROCARE.NS), Jinxin Fertility (1951.HK), AdaptHealth (AHCO), Ginkgo Bioworks (DNA), WELL Health Technologies (WELL.TO), Regis Healthcare (REG.AX), HK inno.N (195940.KS).
Is BML expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.6× against a peer median of 18.6×, 8th most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is -11 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has BML stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -2.0% against +7.8% for the median peer; over one year +3.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.