Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 301569.SZ Novast Laboratories LtdOpen in the cockpit ↗

Novast Laboratories Ltd301569.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Health Care›Pharmaceuticals: Major

Chinese developer of extended-release and low-dose generic drugs, with many products cleared for sale in the US.

≈ A small, China-based Amneal focused on harder-to-make generics
Mkt cap
$4.82B
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$165M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+14.2 pp
WACC 6.9%
Hurdle
+39 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · CNYCN¥19.27
1D-11.6%
1W+5.8%
1Mn/a
3Mn/a
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %33.0%
52w lowhigh54.3% off high

What Novast Laboratories does

Chinese developer of extended-release and low-dose generic drugs, with many products cleared for sale in the US.

Earns from generic drugs it designs itself, chiefly extended-release forms that release the drug slowly and are harder to copy than ordinary tablets. Each US FDA approval lets it start selling a new product, so the pipeline of approvals drives growth. It listed on Shenzhen's ChiNext board in October 2026.

In one line: A small, China-based Amneal focused on harder-to-make generics.

Products and services

  • Extended / controlled-release generics
  • Low-dose generics
  • Hormone products

Customers

  • US generic drug market
  • China prescription drug market

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Generic drugs
  • Extended-release and low-dose…

What could go right

  • More US FDA approvals from its pipeline

What could go wrong

  • US generic price pressure
  • FDA inspection and approval risk

Moat: narrow (process know-how, regulatory licence). Harder-to-make formulations and a record of US FDA approvals limit the number of rivals.

Headquarters: Nantong, China · Employees: 697

Named competitors

Novast Laboratories at a glance

Size Novast Laboratories (301569.SZ) is a China Health Care company (Pharmaceuticals: Major) with a market value of $4.82B, the 524th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥19.27 on 6 Nov 2026.

Growth Revenue grew 3.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.0%); the operating margin is 27.4% (peer median 16.5%).

Valuation It trades at 34.4× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 4.6× (most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 43% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is +39 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 14.2 points above its cost of capital (6.9% WACC).

Novast Laboratories financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenuen/aCN¥893MCN¥866MCN¥700M
Revenue growth—+3%+24%—
Gross profitn/aCN¥490MCN¥465MCN¥343M
EBITDAn/aCN¥281MCN¥273MCN¥121M
Net incomen/aCN¥228MCN¥260MCN¥116M
Free cash flown/aCN¥250MCN¥165MCN¥78.8M
Capital expendituren/aCN¥75.3MCN¥106MCN¥127M
Total debtCN¥0CN¥0CN¥0CN¥0

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Novast Laboratories competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%0×10×20×30×TVTX600079600332LEGNGLAXO326030CAMX002294688336IPCALAB600085PTCT301569.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Novast Laboratories is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+25%+50%+75%+100%0%50%100%TVTX600079600332GLAXO326030CAMX002294EMCURE688336PTCT301569.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Novast Laboratories is the large dot.

Novast Laboratories competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (301569.SZ vs 600521.SS vs AMRX vs TEVA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Novast Laboratories 301569.SZ$4.82Bn/a+3%27%34.4×42.6%
Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical 600521.SS$3.86B+8%+10%12%3.4×7.3%
Amneal Pharmaceuticals AMRX$7.01B+53%+9%17%3.2×15.2%
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited Sponsored ADR TEVA$49.7B+19%-4%19%3.6×10.2%

How Novast Laboratories compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Novast Laboratories against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure301569.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
Distance from 52-week high-54.3%-27.9%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+3.1%+14.0%6th lowest of 19
Operating margin27.4%16.5%6th highest of 19
EV / Sales34.4×4.6×most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)42.6%8.0%most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.1%+12.7%3rd lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+39.4 pp-3.2 ppmost demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+14.2 pp+3.7 pp5th highest of 17
Net debt / EBITDA-5.0×-0.2×least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Novast Laboratories 301569.SZChina$4.82Bn/a+3%27%34.4×42.6%+3.1%
Travere Therapeutics TVTXUnited States$4.76B+16%+49%-3%7.5×16.7%+19.9%
Humanwell Healthcare (Group) 600079.SSChina$4.71B+3%-3%16%1.6×-6.8%+3.0%
Guangzhou Baiyunshan Pharmaceutical 600332.SSChina$4.61B-11%+1%3%0.6×-0.3%+4.7%
Erasca ERASUnited States$5.04B+42%n/an/an/an/an/a
Legend Biotech Corp. Sponsored ADR LEGNUnited States$4.53B-17%+60%-4%3.0×n/an/a
GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals GLAXO.NSIndia$4.53B+2%+12%33%9.8×25.2%+5.5%
SKBP 326030.KSSouth Korea$5.12B-11%+39%35%8.1×0.5%+93.6%
Camurus CAMX.STSweden$4.52B+47%0%37%17.8×10.4%+46.5%
Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceuticals 002294.SZChina$5.18B-39%+14%11%7.0×15.5%+9.7%
Emcure Pharmaceuticals EMCURE.NSIndia$4.47B+33%+21%16%4.3×14.9%+12.7%
Sunshine Guojian Pharmaceutical (Shanghai) 688336.SSChina$4.47B-34%+227%74%6.5×3.3%+45.1%
Definium Therapeutics DFTXUnited States$4.47B+51%n/an/an/an/an/a
IPCA Laboratories IPCALAB.NSIndia$5.22B+24%+11%17%4.9×17.8%+12.2%
Sumitomo Pharma 4506.TJapan$5.23B+7%+11%10%1.8×1.4%-2.6%
Beijing TongRenTang 600085.SSChina$5.27B-8%-17%8%2.4×2.7%+6.2%
Ajanta Pharma AJANTPHARM.NSIndia$4.37B+7%+25%25%6.6×23.8%+13.8%
HanmiPharm 128940.KSSouth Korea$4.36B+2%+14%16%3.5×5.0%+7.5%
Supernus Pharmaceuticals SUPNUnited States$5.43B-49%+16%45%4.1×4.2%+13.9%
PTC Therapeutics PTCTUnited States$5.47B-11%-35%22%3.4×8.0%+35.4%
Gland Pharma GLAND.NSIndia$5.53B+69%+18%20%7.8×28.0%+13.3%

Questions

Who are Novast Laboratories's main competitors?
Named competitors: Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical (600521.SS), Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX), Teva Pharmaceutical (TEVA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Travere Therapeutics (TVTX), Humanwell Healthcare (Group) (600079.SS), Guangzhou Baiyunshan Pharmaceutical (600332.SS), Erasca (ERAS), Legend Biotech Corp. Sponsored ADR (LEGN), GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals (GLAXO.NS).
Is Novast Laboratories expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 34.4× against a peer median of 4.6×, most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 43% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is +39 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.