Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 300287.SZ Beijing Philisense Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Beijing Philisense Technology Co., Ltd. Class A300287.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Information Technology Services
Momentum neutral 53
Mkt cap
$736M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$14.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-12.0 pp
WACC 10.9%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥3.43
1D-2.0%
1W+5.5%
1M-0.3%
3M-10.7%
6M-20.6%
YTD-29.9%
1Y-38.4%
ATR %4.2%
52w lowhigh43.4% off high

What Beijing Philisense Technology does

Employees: 682

Beijing Philisense Technology at a glance

Size Beijing Philisense Technology (300287.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Information Technology Services) with a market value of $736M, the 2961st largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥3.43 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 20.6%, against +5.0% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 51.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.4%); the operating margin is -25.0% (peer median 3.0%).

Valuation It trades at 22.1× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.3× (3rd most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 12.0 points below its cost of capital (10.9% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 107300287.SZ 77
Six months, rebased to 100: Beijing Philisense Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Beijing Philisense Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥220MCN¥348MCN¥585MCN¥823MCN¥1.14B
Revenue growth—-41%-29%-28%—
Gross profitCN¥39.3MCN¥21.4MCN¥50.7MCN¥69.9MCN¥150M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥84.3M-CN¥161M-CN¥143M-CN¥298M
Net income-CN¥69.9M-CN¥157M-CN¥207M-CN¥282M-CN¥469M
Free cash flow-CN¥47.1M-CN¥26.7M-CN¥22.2MCN¥1.54M-CN¥102M
Capital expenditureCN¥4.86MCN¥4.39MCN¥6.79MCN¥49.4MCN¥89.2M
Total debtCN¥26.0MCN¥38.7MCN¥36.9MCN¥37.1MCN¥86.1M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Beijing Philisense Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%0%+20%002657002279SONATSOFTW3762EBGNG69479959MITK000948300465SHF300212OSPN688286002642COKGFT002232300287.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Beijing Philisense Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%0×10×20×30×002657002279SONATSOFTW3762EBGNGMITK000948SHF300212688286300044002232300287.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Beijing Philisense Technology is the large dot.

Beijing Philisense Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Beijing Philisense Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Beijing Philisense Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure300287.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-0.3%-0.3%11th highest of 21
6-month return-20.6%+5.0%5th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-43.4%-30.0%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-51.6%+4.4%lowest of 21
Operating margin-25.0%3.0%4th lowest of 21
EV / Sales22.1×2.3×3rd most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-12.0 pp-1.2 pp5th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Beijing Philisense Technology 300287.SZChina$736M-21%-52%-25%22.1×n/an/a
Sinodata 002657.SZChina$734M-30%-31%-33%5.6×n/an/a
Beijing Join-Cheer Software 002279.SZChina$750M-22%-34%0%2.2×41.2%-1.7%
Sonata Software SONATSOFTW.NSIndia$711M-12%+4%5%0.6×18.5%+20.4%
TechMatrix 3762.TJapan$762M+67%+15%10%1.4×-7.5%+18.3%
Gng Electronics EBGNG.NSIndia$705M+32%+34%11%3.3×n/an/a
Zuken 6947.TJapan$699M+12%+12%14%1.7×-6.8%+8.4%
Linklogis 9959.HKHong Kong$698M+4%+24%-9%n/an/an/a
Mitek Systems MITKUnited States$778M+10%+11%18%3.7×10.9%+12.1%
Yunnan Nantian Electronics Information 000948.SZChina$783M-8%-8%1%0.8×15.7%+18.7%
Global Infotech 300465.SZChina$685M-28%-19%3%4.9×41.1%-11.5%
SNP Schneider-Neureither & Partner SHF.DEGermany$793M+18%+15%20%2.2×2.8%+15.6%
Beijing E-Hualu Information Technology 300212.SZChina$794M+13%-23%-702%31.2×47.3%-29.0%
OneSpan OSPNUnited States$797M+77%+5%18%3.0×14.6%+2.4%
Memsensing Microsystems (Suzhou China) 688286.SSChina$807M+46%-7%-6%9.0×48.4%+13.4%
VTEX VTEXUnited States$666M+6%+10%13%1.9×4.2%+19.5%
Ronglian 002642.SZChina$664M-13%+18%1%2.3×43.6%-7.1%
Shenzhen Sunwin Intelligent 300044.SZChina$663M-14%+116%-679%32.4×n/an/a
Cancom COK.DEGermany$662M-20%-1%3%0.5×6.5%+7.8%
GFT Technologies GFT.DEGermany$819M+35%+3%6%0.9×3.7%+14.8%
Qiming Information Technology 002232.SZChina$822M-24%-4%1%6.0×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Beijing Philisense Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Sinodata (002657.SZ), Beijing Join-Cheer Software (002279.SZ), Sonata Software (SONATSOFTW.NS), TechMatrix (3762.T), Gng Electronics (EBGNG.NS), Zuken (6947.T), Linklogis (9959.HK), Mitek Systems (MITK).
Is Beijing Philisense Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 22.1× against a peer median of 2.3×, 3rd most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Beijing Philisense Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -20.6% against +5.0% for the median peer; over one year -38.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.