Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 300127.SZ Chengdu Galaxy Magnets Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Chengdu Galaxy Magnets Co., Ltd. Class A300127.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Computer Peripherals

Chinese maker of bonded and sintered NdFeB permanent magnets used in motors, sensors and electronics.

Momentum neutral 40
Mkt cap
$1.06B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
45%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$10.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
39.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+6.8 pp
WACC 11.2%
Hurdle
+18 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
143 days
29 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥21.88
1D-3.2%
1W+3.2%
1M-4.8%
3M-7.7%
6M-30.2%
YTD-27.9%
1Y-36.4%
ATR %3.9%
52w lowhigh47.9% off high

What Chengdu Galaxy Magnets does

Chinese maker of bonded and sintered NdFeB permanent magnets used in motors, sensors and electronics.

Rare-earth metals are the main cost, and magnet prices tend to move with them, so profit is the processing margin rather than a bet on metal prices. Bonded magnets are shaped to a customer's part and go into small motors and sensors, where they are designed in early and then reordered.

Products and services

  • Bonded NdFeB magnets
  • Sintered NdFeB magnets

Customers

  • Motor makers
  • Consumer-electronics/auto component makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Magnetic materials
  • Bonded NdFeB magnets

What could go right

  • EV and precision-motor demand for magnets

What could go wrong

  • Rare-earth (NdFeB) feedstock cost swings

Moat: narrow (process know-how, customer qualification). Magnet-grade quality control and customer qualification create modest switching costs.

Headquarters: Chengdu, Sichuan, China · Employees: 1,480

Named competitors

Chengdu Galaxy Magnets at a glance

Size Chengdu Galaxy Magnets (300127.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Computer Peripherals) with a market value of $1.06B, the 2188th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥21.88 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 30.2%, against -20.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 29.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.7%); the operating margin is 21.3% (peer median 1.0%).

Valuation It trades at 39.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.9× (4th most expensive of 10).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 25% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is +18 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.8 points above its cost of capital (11.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 80300127.SZ 68
Six months, rebased to 100: Chengdu Galaxy Magnets against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Chengdu Galaxy Magnets financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.06BCN¥853MCN¥794MCN¥819MCN¥987M
Revenue growth—+7%-3%-17%—
Gross profitCN¥372MCN¥287MCN¥243MCN¥251MCN¥260M
EBITDAn/aCN¥218MCN¥177MCN¥187MCN¥192M
Net incomeCN¥204MCN¥178MCN¥147MCN¥161MCN¥171M
Free cash flowCN¥72.1MCN¥18.7MCN¥243MCN¥602,980CN¥162M
Capital expenditureCN¥65.2MCN¥80.9MCN¥44.8MCN¥24.5MCN¥54.7M
Total debtCN¥3.86MCN¥2.71MCN¥1.45MCN¥70.9MCN¥0

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Chengdu Galaxy Magnets competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-30%-20%-10%0%67506191152300295524643005792038000536307630036964516885830023870023766038590025774915600203688055300127.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Chengdu Galaxy Magnets is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%0×100×200×675061911523002955246430763003696038594915300127.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Chengdu Galaxy Magnets is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%6750152330057920380005363076300369002387002376300127.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Chengdu Galaxy Magnets is the large dot.

Chengdu Galaxy Magnets competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (300127.SZ vs 000970.SZ vs 300748.SZ vs 600366.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Chengdu Galaxy Magnets 300127.SZ$1.06B-30%+29%21%39.8×25.3%
Beijing Zhong Ke San Huan High-Tech 000970.SZ$1.87B-16%+11%3%65.8×n/a
JL Mag Rare-Earth 300748.SZ$4.54B-27%+39%11%33.1×22.1%
Ningbo Yunsheng 600366.SS$1.64B-24%+33%6%19.3×19.1%

How Chengdu Galaxy Magnets compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Chengdu Galaxy Magnets against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure300127.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.8%-10.2%7th highest of 21
6-month return-30.2%-20.4%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-47.9%-40.7%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+29.0%+8.7%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin21.3%1.0%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E39.8×16.9×4th most expensive of 10
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)25.3%23.8%5th most demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.4%+4.3%4th highest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+17.9 pp+20.7 pp5th least demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital+6.8 pp-4.9 pp3rd highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Chengdu Galaxy Magnets 300127.SZChina$1.06B-30%+29%21%39.8×25.3%+7.4%
Elecom 6750.TJapan$1.07B+14%+15%12%12.1×-9.4%+4.3%
Global Brands Manufacture 6191.TWTaiwan$1.09B-28%+49%8%9.2×n/an/a
Plover Bay Technologies 1523.HKHong Kong$959M-22%+16%42%17.7×3.8%+19.9%
Hitevision 002955.SZChina$928M+2%-2%3%15.4×n/an/a
Mirle Automation 2464.TWTaiwan$928M+19%-4%1%56.5×n/an/a
Beijing Certificate Authority 300579.SZChina$912M-15%-11%-11%n/a29.0%-0.4%
FIH Mobile 2038.HKHong Kong$1.24B-51%+17%1%n/a-11.2%-5.6%
Hua Ying Technology (Group) 000536.SZChina$1.27B-23%-13%-54%n/a47.9%-8.6%
Ai Holdings Corporation 3076.TJapan$885M+10%+28%13%16.9×-6.9%+13.0%
NSFOCUS Technologies 300369.SZChina$1.29B+45%+8%-4%266.0×38.1%+4.9%
ShunSin Technology 6451.TWTaiwan$866M-53%+8%4%n/an/an/a
Scantech (Hangzhou) 688583.SSChina$1.31B-20%+4%1%n/an/an/a
Visionox Technology 002387.SZChina$1.35B-20%-1%-35%n/a50.6%+18.9%
Shandong New Beiyang Information Technology 002376.SZChina$794M-9%+21%0%n/a23.8%+3.1%
Toyou Feiji Electronics 300302.SZChina$1.49B-24%+5%-15%n/an/an/a
Nancal Technology 603859.SSChina$1.49B-5%+10%12%42.5×n/an/a
Shenzhen Rapoo Technology 002577.SZChina$754M+4%+11%-2%n/an/an/a
Primax Electronics 4915.TWTaiwan$744M-29%+9%4%10.5×n/an/a
Fujian Furi Electronics 600203.SSChina$736M-32%+35%0%n/an/an/a
InfoVision Optoelectronics (Kunshan) 688055.SSChina$1.56B-23%-24%-19%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Chengdu Galaxy Magnets's main competitors?
Named competitors: Zhong Ke San Huan (000970.SZ), JL Mag Rare-Earth (300748.SZ), Ningbo Yunsheng (600366.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Elecom (6750.T), Global Brands Manufacture (6191.TW), Plover Bay Technologies (1523.HK), Hitevision (002955.SZ), Mirle Automation (2464.TW), Beijing Certificate Authority (300579.SZ).
Is Chengdu Galaxy Magnets expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 39.8× against a peer median of 16.9×, 4th most expensive of 10 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 25% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is +18 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Chengdu Galaxy Magnets stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -30.2% against -20.4% for the median peer; over one year -36.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.