Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 300067.SZ Shanghai Anoky Group Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shanghai Anoky Group Co., Ltd. Class A300067.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Textiles
Momentum weak 32
Mkt cap
$853M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$37.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-9.4 pp
WACC 12.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥4.86
1D-1.2%
1W+7.0%
1M-6.2%
3M-12.3%
6M-29.1%
YTD-2.8%
1Y+4.3%
ATR %5.2%
52w lowhigh40.6% off high

What Shanghai Anoky does

Employees: 721

Shanghai Anoky at a glance

Size Shanghai Anoky (300067.SZ) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Textiles) with a market value of $853M, the 2609th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥4.86 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 29.1%, against -11.8% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 36.1% over the last twelve months (peer median -1.4%); the operating margin is 2.6% (peer median 5.0%).

Valuation It trades at 4.8× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.4× (3rd most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.4 points below its cost of capital (12.7% WACC).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 87300067.SZ 64
Six months, rebased to 100: Shanghai Anoky against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shanghai Anoky financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.36BCN¥1.00BCN¥970MCN¥807MCN¥749M
Revenue growth—+3%+20%+8%—
Gross profitCN¥304MCN¥57.8MCN¥139MCN¥99.3MCN¥157M
EBITDAn/aCN¥54.4MCN¥99.4MCN¥49.3MCN¥91.2M
Net incomeCN¥9.21M-CN¥63.2M-CN¥4.75MCN¥8.15MCN¥31.3M
Free cash flow-CN¥179M-CN¥82.5M-CN¥416M-CN¥158M-CN¥373M
Capital expenditureCN¥199MCN¥102MCN¥238MCN¥278MCN¥265M
Total debtCN¥1.01BCN¥792MCN¥790MCN¥645MCN¥486M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shanghai Anoky competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%-10%0%600370002206603130600617601599002042143400267460388929802030023201002327002201600626300819000782600987600889300180300067.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shanghai Anoky is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%0×2.5×5×7.5×60037000220660313060159900204214340026746038892980203201002327002201600626300819600987600889300180300067.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shanghai Anoky is the large dot.

Shanghai Anoky competitors and peer comparison

How Shanghai Anoky compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shanghai Anoky against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure300067.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-6.2%-0.6%9th lowest of 21
6-month return-29.1%-11.8%6th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-40.6%-34.3%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+36.1%-1.4%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin2.6%5.0%8th lowest of 21
EV / Sales4.8×1.4×3rd most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-9.4 pp-2.4 pplowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Shanghai Anoky 300067.SZChina$853M-29%+36%3%4.8×n/an/a
Jiangsu Sanfame Polyester Material 600370.SSChina$857M-44%-13%-3%0.7×n/an/a
Zhejiang Hailide New Material 002206.SZChina$845M-18%-7%11%1.3×-2.2%+10.7%
Zhejiang Yunzhongma 603130.SSChina$867M-8%+4%4%2.4×21.1%+18.8%
Shanxi Guoxin Energy Corporation Limited 600617.SSChina$838M-16%-9%3%1.4×0.8%+4.5%
Zhewen Pictures 601599.SSChina$884M+37%+4%1%1.8×46.4%+13.9%
Huafu Fashion 002042.SZChina$822M-31%-23%2%1.3×15.1%-10.8%
Formosa Taffeta 1434.TWTaiwan$888M+9%-7%2%1.3×19.9%-0.9%
Xingye Leather Technology 002674.SZChina$807M+35%+7%8%1.9×14.3%+15.4%
Zhejiang Xinao Textiles 603889.SSChina$908M-5%+20%13%1.4×n/an/a
Hyosung Tnc 298020.KSSouth Korea$911M-45%+8%5%0.1×n/an/a
Gunze 3002.TJapan$797M+17%-4%5%1.1×10.5%+1.1%
Japan Wool Textile 3201.TJapan$792M+14%0%11%0.9×-8.6%+2.6%
Shenzhen Fuanna Bedding & Furnishing 002327.SZChina$951M-26%-5%12%2.4×-1.3%-2.1%
Jiangsu Jiuding New Material 002201.SZChina$760M-42%+6%9%3.0×22.1%+1.4%
Shanghai Shenda 600626.SSChina$745M-4%-2%1%0.6×-1.0%-0.1%
Jiangsu Jujie Microfiber Technology 300819.SZChina$734M-42%+5%9%8.4×n/an/a
Guangdong Highsun Meida New Materials 000782.SZChina$728M-4%0%-5%2.4×n/an/a
Zhejiang Hangmin 600987.SSChina$1.02B-6%-23%8%0.4×n/an/a
Nanjing Chemical Fibre 600889.SSChina$1.03B-24%+115%5%8.4×35.4%-3.9%
Huafon Microfibre (Shanghai) 300180.SZChina$1.06B-24%-6%-1%2.0×16.2%+4.4%

Questions

Which companies are Shanghai Anoky's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Jiangsu Sanfame Polyester Material (600370.SS), Zhejiang Hailide New Material (002206.SZ), Zhejiang Yunzhongma (603130.SS), Shanxi Guoxin Energy Corporation Limited (600617.SS), Zhewen Pictures (601599.SS), Huafu Fashion (002042.SZ), Formosa Taffeta (1434.TW), Xingye Leather Technology (002674.SZ).
Is Shanghai Anoky expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 4.8× against a peer median of 1.4×, 3rd most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Shanghai Anoky stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -29.1% against -11.8% for the median peer; over one year +4.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.