Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2799.HK China CITIC Financial Asset Management Co., Ltd. Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

China CITIC Financial Asset Management Co., Ltd. Class H2799.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Financials›Investment Managers

State-backed distressed-debt manager that buys and resolves China's non-performing loans, formerly China Huarong.

≈ A Chinese 'bad bank' akin to a state-run distressed-asset fundMomentum neutral 50
Mkt cap
$5.83B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
38%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.56M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
3.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
146 days
1 Apr 2027
Close · HKDHK$0.57
1D-1.7%
1W+5.6%
1M-5.8%
3M-2.6%
6M-24.0%
YTD-31.3%
1Y-46.7%
ATR %3.3%
52w lowhigh47.7% off high

What China CITIC Financial Asset Management does

State-backed distressed-debt manager that buys and resolves China's non-performing loans, formerly China Huarong.

Buys distressed loans from banks at a discount and earns by collecting more than it paid, or by restructuring and selling the assets behind them, with some income from financial services. It was formerly China Huarong, set up by the Ministry of Finance; CITIC Group became a major shareholder in 2022 and the company took its present name.

In one line: A Chinese 'bad bank' akin to a state-run distressed-asset fund.

Products and services

  • NPL acquisition & disposal
  • Restructuring/asset management
  • Financial leasing/other financial services

Customers

  • Banks selling non-performing loans
  • Distressed corporate borrowers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Financials
  • Distressed assets
  • Non-performing loan acquisition…

What could go right

  • China NPL cycle following property/credit stress
  • State-directed restructuring mandates

What could go wrong

  • Credit-cycle/collection-rate risk
  • Legacy balance-sheet impairments

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, scale). One of a handful of licensed national asset-management companies for bank NPL resolution.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Founded: 1999 · Employees: 4,738

Named competitors

China CITIC Financial Asset Management at a glance

Size China CITIC Financial Asset Management (2799.HK) is a Hong Kong Financials company (Investment Managers) with a market value of $5.83B, the 237th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$0.57 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 24.0%, against +0.1% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 17.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.4%); the operating margin is 135.4% (peer median 31.9%).

Valuation It trades at 3.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.6× (cheapest of 19).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1002799.HK 78
Six months, rebased to 100: China CITIC Financial Asset Management against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

China CITIC Financial Asset Management financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$24.6BHK$24.9BHK$33.3BHK$35.4BHK$46.8B
Revenue growth—-25%-6%-24%—
Gross profitHK$23.6BHK$23.8BHK$32.3BHK$34.4BHK$44.7B
EBITDAHK$33.7BHK$29.1BHK$24.0BHK$24.2BHK$30.4B
Net incomeHK$12.2BHK$11.1BHK$9.34BHK$1.95B-HK$32.1B
Free cash flow-HK$23.4B-HK$34.5B-HK$41.1B-HK$37.5B-HK$61.8B
Capital expenditureHK$847MHK$58.0MHK$3.70BHK$432MHK$626M
Total debtn/aHK$1.08THK$952BHK$955BHK$944B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

China CITIC Financial Asset Management competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%0%+10%STEPVONNEFGN002945601136ABDNN91601108HASIHLNE360ONECIGIBPT601377FHINAM-INDIAICGVCTREMGBGN2799.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. China CITIC Financial Asset Management is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%20×40×STEPVONNEFGNABDNN91601108HASIHLNE360ONECIGIBPT601377NAM-INDIAICGVCTREMGBGN2799.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. China CITIC Financial Asset Management is the large dot.

China CITIC Financial Asset Management competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (2799.HK vs 1359.HK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
China CITIC Financial Asset Management 2799.HK$5.83B-24%-18%135%3.1×n/a
China Cinda Asset Management 1359.HK$4.36B-21%-25%53%11.7×n/a

How China CITIC Financial Asset Management compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

China CITIC Financial Asset Management against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2799.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-5.8%+3.7%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-24.0%+0.1%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-47.7%-15.8%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-17.6%+14.4%lowest of 21
Operating margin135.4%31.9%highest of 21
Forward P/E3.1×12.6×cheapest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
China CITIC Financial Asset Management 2799.HKHong Kong$5.83B-24%-18%135%3.1×n/an/a
StepStone STEPUnited States$5.73B-15%+51%-53%18.1×n/an/a
Vontobel VONN.SWSwitzerland$6.18B+36%+11%25%12.6×n/an/a
EFG International EFGN.SWSwitzerland$6.26B-1%-1%26%14.4×n/an/a
ChinaLin Securities 002945.SZChina$6.27B0%+15%25%n/an/an/a
Capital Securities 601136.SSChina$5.41B-21%+1%36%n/an/an/a
Aberdeen ABDN.LUnited Kingdom$5.36B+2%+2%37%14.3×n/an/a
Ninety One N91.LUnited Kingdom$5.18B-6%+10%26%11.1×n/an/a
Caitong Securities 601108.SSChina$5.12B-11%-12%31%10.7×n/an/a
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital HASIUnited States$5.00B-5%+27%69%12.6×n/an/a
Hamilton Lane HLNEUnited States$4.99B+1%+19%58%12.3×n/an/a
360 One Wam 360ONE.NSIndia$4.95B+3%+25%33%35.1×n/an/a
Colliers International CIGI.TOCanada$4.88B-5%+14%7%11.8×n/an/a
Bridgepoint BPT.LUnited Kingdom$4.79B+55%+36%49%10.7×n/an/a
China Industrial Securities 601377.SSChina$7.12B-9%-11%29%13.2×n/an/a
Federated Hermes FHIUnited States$4.73B+14%+13%28%10.9×n/an/a
Nippon Life India Asset Management NAM-INDIA.NSIndia$7.22B-4%+23%68%39.1×n/an/a
ICG ICG.LUnited Kingdom$7.32B+2%+6%60%11.9×n/an/a
Victory Capital VCTRUnited States$7.38B+40%+50%46%14.0×n/an/a
Man EMG.LUnited Kingdom$4.43B+10%+24%28%8.4×n/an/a
Banca Generali BGN.MIItaly$7.73B+4%+17%38%15.3×n/an/a

Questions

Who are China CITIC Financial Asset Management's main competitors?
Named competitors: China Cinda Asset Management (1359.HK), China Orient Asset Management (private or unlisted), Great Wall Asset Management (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes StepStone (STEP), Vontobel (VONN.SW), EFG International (EFGN.SW), ChinaLin Securities (002945.SZ), Capital Securities (601136.SS), Aberdeen (ABDN.L).
Is China CITIC Financial Asset Management expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 3.1× against a peer median of 12.6×, cheapest of 19 in its peer set.
How has China CITIC Financial Asset Management stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -24.0% against +0.1% for the median peer; over one year -46.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.