Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2402.HK Beijing SinoHytec Co., Ltd. Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

Beijing SinoHytec Co., Ltd. Class H2402.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Industrials›Industrial Machinery
Momentum laggard 8
Mkt cap
$519M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
92%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.11M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-40.3 pp
WACC 10.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
168 days
23 Apr 2027
Close · HKDHK$7.98
1D-3.2%
1W+3.2%
1M-22.4%
3M-39.0%
6M-56.1%
YTD-61.0%
1Y-73.3%
ATR %6.7%
52w lowhigh77.8% off high

What Beijing SinoHytec does

Employees: 482

Beijing SinoHytec at a glance

Size Beijing SinoHytec (2402.HK) is a Hong Kong Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $519M, the 746th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$7.98 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 56.1%, against -28.6% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 81.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.6%); the operating margin is -203.7% (peer median 7.1%).

Valuation It trades at 10.7× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.9× (most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 40.3 points below its cost of capital (10.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

40608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 692402.HK 44
Six months, rebased to 100: Beijing SinoHytec against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Beijing SinoHytec financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$302MHK$280MHK$397MHK$881MHK$857M
Revenue growth—-30%-55%+3%—
Gross profitHK$169M-HK$33.9M-HK$39.5MHK$199MHK$250M
EBITDAn/a-HK$429M-HK$498M-HK$242M-HK$157M
Net income-HK$609M-HK$728M-HK$495M-HK$269M-HK$194M
Free cash flow-HK$58.5M-HK$36.5M-HK$54.8M-HK$694M-HK$567M
Capital expenditureHK$21.3MHK$54.3MHK$37.4MHK$82.3MHK$191M
Total debtHK$468MHK$566MHK$896MHK$768MHK$447M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Beijing SinoHytec competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-20%2729002564001332300690300756IQE300490NMAN6039336031066254603912HY002871GMMPFAUDLR6459PRV64586031502402.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Beijing SinoHytec is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%0×5×10×2729002564001332300690300756300490NMAN6039336031066254603912HY002871GMMPFAUDLR6459PRV64586031503001932402.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Beijing SinoHytec is the large dot.

Beijing SinoHytec competitors and peer comparison

How Beijing SinoHytec compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Beijing SinoHytec against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2402.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-22.4%-19.6%7th lowest of 21
6-month return-56.1%-28.6%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-77.8%-48.6%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+81.6%+2.6%highest of 21
Operating margin-203.7%7.1%lowest of 21
EV / Sales10.7×1.9×most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-40.3 pp-3.2 pplowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Beijing SinoHytec 2402.HKHong Kong$519M-56%+82%-204%10.7×n/an/a
Zhejiang Galaxis Technology 2729.HKHong Kong$518M-74%+26%-4%3.6×n/an/a
Suzhou Thvow Technology 002564.SZChina$521M-33%-9%4%3.0×27.5%-19.9%
Wuxi Chemical Equipment 001332.SZChina$517M-50%-10%11%1.9×10.2%+7.3%
Shandong Shuangyi Technology 300690.SZChina$521M-26%+15%15%2.5×10.9%-6.3%
Guangdong Jinma Entertainment 300756.SZChina$521M-59%-8%0%5.0×n/an/a
IQE IQE.LUnited Kingdom$514M-39%+20%-11%3.4×n/an/a
HNAC Technology 300490.SZChina$525M-57%+79%0%1.2×n/an/a
Nederman NMAN.STSweden$512M+22%-6%8%1.3×4.4%+9.5%
Fujian Raynen Technology 603933.SSChina$526M-31%+29%3%1.6×n/an/a
Cashway Fintech 603106.SSChina$526M-24%-36%8%10.1×n/an/a
Nomura Micro Science 6254.TJapan$527M-43%-48%11%2.5×22.4%+13.1%
Nanjing Canatal Data-Centre Environmental Tech 603912.SSChina$529M-38%-18%-19%4.7×n/an/a
Hyster-Yale HYUnited States$509M-24%-11%-1%0.3×32.0%+6.0%
Qingdao Weflo Valve 002871.SZChina$530M-24%+17%18%4.3×22.0%+14.3%
GMM Pfaudler GMMPFAUDLR.NSIndia$532M+22%+14%7%1.4×13.9%+28.6%
Daiwa 6459.TJapan$507M-19%0%15%0.4×n/an/a
Porvair PRV.LUnited Kingdom$532M+15%+3%13%2.0×6.8%+7.5%
Sinko Industries 6458.TJapan$507M-8%+2%15%1.3×-1.4%+8.7%
Higa 603150.SSChina$532M-32%+76%3%0.9×15.7%+27.7%
Shenzhen Jasic Technology 300193.SZChina$506M-17%+21%14%1.4×-0.1%+4.5%

Questions

Which companies are Beijing SinoHytec's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Zhejiang Galaxis Technology (2729.HK), Suzhou Thvow Technology (002564.SZ), Wuxi Chemical Equipment (001332.SZ), Shandong Shuangyi Technology (300690.SZ), Guangdong Jinma Entertainment (300756.SZ), IQE (IQE.L), HNAC Technology (300490.SZ), Nederman (NMAN.ST).
Is Beijing SinoHytec expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 10.7× against a peer median of 1.9×, most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Beijing SinoHytec stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -56.1% against -28.6% for the median peer; over one year -73.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.