Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2041.HK Medcaptain Medical Technology Co. Ltd. Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

Medcaptain Medical Technology Co. Ltd. Class H2041.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Health Care›Medical Specialties
Mkt cap
$412M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
67%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$168,755
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-5.5 pp
WACC 7.5%
Hurdle
+5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · HKDHK$6.00
1D-2.7%
1W-3.6%
1M-15.1%
3Mn/a
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %7.3%
52w lowhigh45.0% off high

What Medcaptain Medical Technology does

No business profile yet.

Medcaptain Medical Technology at a glance

Size Medcaptain Medical Technology (2041.HK) is a Hong Kong Health Care company (Medical Specialties) with a market value of $412M, the 811th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$6.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Growth Revenue grew 19.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.8%); the operating margin is 2.5% (peer median 5.7%).

Valuation It trades at 1.6× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 5.0× (3rd cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +18%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.5 points below its cost of capital (7.5% WACC).

Medcaptain Medical Technology financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$1.94BHK$1.76BHK$1.52BHK$1.45BHK$1.07B
Revenue growth—+16%+5%+36%—
Gross profitHK$1.06BHK$943MHK$754MHK$720MHK$466M
EBITDAHK$190MHK$189MHK$18.8MHK$13.1M-HK$198M
Net incomeHK$10.4MHK$53.0M-HK$105M-HK$70.4M-HK$259M
Free cash flowHK$196MHK$104MHK$57.2M-HK$33.3MHK$16.8M
Capital expenditureHK$99.4MHK$107MHK$146MHK$99.7MHK$110M
Total debtHK$495MHK$455MHK$460MHK$604MHK$561M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Medcaptain Medical Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+200%+400%0×250×500×750×458870688338CERS301097YDESSSII2041.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Medcaptain Medical Technology is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+100%+200%0%100%200%458870688338300562605186473669296882733006532041.HKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Medcaptain Medical Technology is the large dot.

Medcaptain Medical Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Medcaptain Medical Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Medcaptain Medical Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2041.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-15.1%-11.3%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-45.0%-40.2%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+19.4%+6.8%5th highest of 20
Operating margin2.5%5.7%9th lowest of 20
EV / Sales1.6×5.0×3rd cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)23.3%9.8%3rd most demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+18.1%+4.4%2nd highest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+5.3 pp+6.2 pp5th least demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital-5.5 pp-5.2 pp10th highest of 19
EV / EBITDA16.5×12.3×3rd most expensive of 6
Net debt / EBITDA-0.5×-2.1×4th least indebted of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Medcaptain Medical Technology 2041.HKHong Kong$412Mn/a+19%3%1.6×23.3%+18.1%
SEERS 458870.KSSouth Korea$409M-70%+425%43%5.5×-9.1%+247.0%
Beijing Succeeder Technology 688338.SSChina$408M-15%-4%31%5.4×9.8%+3.4%
Cerus CERSUnited States$408M-23%+14%-12%1.9×n/an/a
Shanghai Kehua Bio-Engineering 002022.SZChina$407M-14%+3%-45%1.9×n/an/a
Ningbo Tianyi Medical Appliance 301097.SZChina$407M-20%+46%8%4.3×n/an/a
Guangdong Transtek Medical Electronics 300562.SZChina$406M-13%+7%11%2.0×-2.5%-6.0%
Shanghai General Healthy Information & Technology 605186.SSChina$417M+3%+12%6%8.1×55.5%+3.8%
YD Bio YDESUnited States$423M-58%+17%-883%704.2×n/an/a
SS Innovations International SSIIUnited States$423M-45%+90%-16%8.0×n/an/a
Shoulder Innovations SIUnited States$428M+56%+61%-59%5.7×n/an/a
NeuroPace NPCEUnited States$429M-32%+12%-15%4.5×n/an/a
Taidoc Technology 4736.TWTaiwan$395M0%-6%18%1.9×-8.0%-6.6%
Shanghai Titan Scientific 688133.SSChina$432M-22%-5%-5%1.5×n/an/a
OrbusNeich Medical 6929.HKHong Kong$389M-3%+16%23%1.0×-18.5%+15.4%
908 Devices MASSUnited States$436M+29%+1%-35%5.5×n/an/a
Clarity Pharmaceuticals CU6.AXAustralia$386M-48%n/an/an/an/an/a
Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology 688273.SSChina$385M-44%-12%8%5.0×39.0%+5.2%
Guanhao Biotech 300238.SZChina$440M-25%-7%5%7.8×n/an/a
Chison Medical Technologies 688358.SSChina$443M-16%-1%19%4.4×11.8%+5.6%
Yantai Zhenghai Bio-Tech 300653.SZChina$380M-23%-8%17%6.0×20.0%+4.4%

Questions

Which companies are Medcaptain Medical Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: SEERS (458870.KS), Beijing Succeeder Technology (688338.SS), Cerus (CERS), Shanghai Kehua Bio-Engineering (002022.SZ), Ningbo Tianyi Medical Appliance (301097.SZ), Guangdong Transtek Medical Electronics (300562.SZ), Shanghai General Healthy Information & Technology (605186.SS), YD Bio (YDES).
Is Medcaptain Medical Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.6× against a peer median of 5.0×, 3rd cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +18%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.