Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1942.T Kandenko Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Kandenko Co., Ltd.1942.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Provides electrical construction services, affiliated with Japan's TEPCO utility group.

≈ A large electrical contractor tied to a utility parentMomentum laggard 5
Mkt cap
$5.26B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
59%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$43.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+9.3 pp
WACC 8.9%
Hurdle
-7 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
87 days
1 Feb 2027
Close · JPY¥4,062
1D-5.9%
1W-23.8%
1M-26.4%
3M-23.7%
6M-40.6%
YTD-19.2%
1Y-8.0%
ATR %5.2%
52w lowhigh45.5% off high

What Kandenko does

Provides electrical construction services, affiliated with Japan's TEPCO utility group.

In one line: A large electrical contractor tied to a utility parent.

Products and services

  • Electrical construction
  • Grid/substation construction
  • Facility maintenance

Customers

  • TEPCO group
  • Building owners/developers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Engineering & construction
  • Electrical construction contracting
  • Grid/building electrical works

What could go right

  • Grid modernization spending

What could go wrong

  • Construction labor shortage
  • Dependence on TEPCO group work

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, scale). Long-standing TEPCO-affiliated contractor relationship anchors steady grid-related work.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1944 · Employees: 10,850

Named competitors

Kandenko at a glance

Size Kandenko (1942.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $5.26B, the 233rd largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥4,062 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 40.6%, against -7.0% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 3.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.1%); the operating margin is 11.8% (peer median 8.0%).

Valuation It trades at 11.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.9× (4th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.3 points above its cost of capital (8.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 931942.T 60
Six months, rebased to 100: Kandenko against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Kandenko financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥753B¥742B¥672B¥598B¥542B
Revenue growth—+10%+12%+10%—
Gross profit¥130B¥121B¥92.9B¥71.2B¥60.1B
EBITDA¥101B¥94.0B¥68.1B¥49.8B¥40.8B
Net income¥66.2B¥63.5B¥42.4B¥27.3B¥21.2B
Free cash flown/a¥73.7B¥3.38B¥1.57B¥2.00B
Capital expendituren/a¥15.8B¥14.9B¥18.3B¥5.46B
Total debt¥8.71B¥14.1B¥27.1B¥27.3B¥15.8B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kandenko competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%SWEC-AGVAMWHBBY065924041944VSECBDXMAIRETPCFLR5076DY1735ARCADROADIESCRVNL1942.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kandenko is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%20×40×60×SWEC-AGVABBY065924041944VSECBDXMAIRETPC3311FLR5076DY1735ROADIESCRVNL1942.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kandenko is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%SWEC-AGVABBY065924041944BDXMAIRETPC33115076DYROADIESC1942.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Kandenko is the large dot.

Kandenko competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (1942.T vs 1944.T vs 1951.T vs 1961.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Kandenko 1942.T$5.26B-41%+4%12%11.2×-0.9%
Kinden 1944.T$5.56B-36%+8%13%11.6×-0.9%
EXEO 1951.T$2.84B-22%+18%7%12.2×-5.0%
Sanki Engineering 1961.T$1.98B-12%+2%12%11.5×-6.5%
Yurtec 1934.T$998M-8%-2%8%11.0×-6.2%
MIRAIT ONE 1417.T$1.60B-24%+5%6%10.4×-5.7%

How Kandenko compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kandenko against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1942.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-26.4%+0.5%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-40.6%-7.0%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-45.5%-23.9%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+3.7%+12.1%4th lowest of 20
Operating margin11.8%8.0%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E11.2×14.9×4th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-0.9%5.3%4th least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.9%+8.7%5th lowest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-6.8 pp-4.3 pp8th least demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital+9.3 pp+1.6 pp4th highest of 18
EV / EBITDA7.4×11.1×2nd cheapest of 17
Net debt / EBITDA-0.9×1.4×6th least indebted of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Kandenko 1942.TJapan$5.26B-41%+4%12%11.2×-0.9%+5.9%
Sweco SWEC-A.STSweden$5.32B+12%+6%10%20.6×5.0%+8.7%
Granite Construction GVAUnited States$5.32B-15%+25%7%16.7×10.1%+7.2%
SOLV Energy MWHUnited States$5.19B-40%n/a8%14.9×26.2%n/a
Balfour Beatty BBY.LUnited Kingdom$5.34B+1%+12%2%17.2×1.0%+5.3%
CTF Services 0659.HKHong Kong$5.13B+2%+12%11%13.8×1.7%-0.8%
United Integrated Services 2404.TWTaiwan$5.11B-9%+72%18%9.7×-11.4%+13.0%
Kinden 1944.TJapan$5.56B-36%+8%13%11.6×-0.9%+6.2%
VSE VSECUnited States$4.85B-10%+23%12%22.1×n/an/a
Budimex BDX.WAPoland$4.82B+10%+12%9%26.5×15.7%+4.1%
MAIRE MAIRE.MIItaly$4.81B-12%+7%7%14.7×2.9%+22.1%
Tutor Perini TPCUnited States$4.73B+8%+25%4%18.8×9.6%+0.8%
China State Construction International 3311.HKHong Kong$6.04B-5%-14%15%5.0×-8.1%+11.8%
Fluor FLRUnited States$6.22B+7%-5%-2%14.2×n/an/a
INFRONEER 5076.TJapan$4.44B+2%+44%6%6.2×0.0%+10.7%
Dycom Industries DYUnited States$6.26B-52%+38%8%12.1×11.6%+11.6%
Central New Energy 1735.HKHong Kong$4.42B-11%+76%1%63.1×n/an/a
Arcadis ARCAD.ASNetherlands$4.42B+31%-1%6%15.0×5.5%+8.1%
Construction Partners ROADUnited States$4.38B-45%+42%9%26.5×12.5%+29.1%
IES IESCUnited States$6.38B+32%+23%12%12.6×11.2%+22.9%
Rail Vikas Nigam RVNL.NSIndia$4.27B-37%+5%4%46.0×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Kandenko's main competitors?
Named competitors: Kinden Corp (1944.T), Kyowa Exeo (1951.T), Sanki Engineering (1961.T), Sumitomo Densetsu (private or unlisted), Yurtec (1934.T), Mirait One (1417.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Sweco (SWEC-A.ST), Granite Construction (GVA), SOLV Energy (MWH), Balfour Beatty (BBY.L), CTF Services (0659.HK), United Integrated Services (2404.TW).
Is Kandenko expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.2× against a peer median of 14.9×, 4th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Kandenko stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -40.6% against -7.0% for the median peer; over one year -8.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.