Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1921.HK Dalipal Holdings LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Dalipal Holdings Limited1921.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Energy›Oilfield Services/Equipment
Momentum weak 36
Mkt cap
$603M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
29%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$373,002
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.2 pp
WACC 5.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
133 days
19 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$3.07
1D+0.7%
1W+9.1%
1M-1.8%
3M-16.9%
6M-29.1%
YTD-57.8%
1Y-51.9%
ATR %5.6%
52w lowhigh69.3% off high

What Dalipal does

Employees: 2,096

Dalipal at a glance

Size Dalipal (1921.HK) is a Hong Kong Energy company (Oilfield Services/Equipment) with a market value of $603M, the 715th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$3.07 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 29.1%, against -15.6% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.6% over the last twelve months (peer median -4.9%); the operating margin is 2.6% (peer median 6.5%).

Valuation It trades at 14.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.2× (7th most expensive of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.2 points below its cost of capital (5.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 19 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 841921.HK 73
Six months, rebased to 100: Dalipal against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Dalipal financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$3.84BHK$3.79BHK$3.57BHK$4.25BHK$4.92B
Revenue growth—+6%-16%-13%—
Gross profitHK$461MHK$424MHK$286MHK$584MHK$710M
EBITDAHK$257MHK$233MHK$99.3MHK$377MHK$454M
Net incomeHK$15.3MHK$14.9M-HK$83.6MHK$149MHK$176M
Free cash flow-HK$396M-HK$281M-HK$448MHK$275MHK$614M
Capital expenditureHK$354MHK$741MHK$357MHK$140MHK$96.5M
Total debtn/aHK$2.90BHK$2.38BHK$2.09BHK$2.19B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Dalipal competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-40%-20%0%688377ATACDC300084AESI05686330HTGCFW002554OISHMHVIRIPUMPFET603727DEEPINDSTOTFTKSEAMECLTD1921.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Dalipal is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%0×100×200×688377AT6330HTGCFWOISHMHFET603727DEEPINDSTOTFTKSEAMECLTD1921.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Dalipal is the large dot.

Dalipal competitors and peer comparison

How Dalipal compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Dalipal against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1921.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.8%-8.7%7th highest of 21
6-month return-29.1%-15.6%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-69.3%-42.0%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.6%-4.9%8th highest of 21
Operating margin2.6%6.5%10th lowest of 21
Forward P/E14.5×14.2×7th most expensive of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.2 pp-4.8 pp10th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA29.1×9.0×most expensive of 15
Net debt / EBITDA10.7×0.9×2nd most indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Dalipal 1921.HKHong Kong$603M-29%+3%3%14.5×n/an/a
Nanjing Develop Advanced Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Class 1 688377.SSChina$554M-52%0%9%30.2×7.5%+11.4%
Ashtead Technology AT..LUnited Kingdom$660M+26%+9%26%16.2×-5.5%+36.8%
ProFrac ACDCUnited States$547M-55%-16%-11%n/an/an/a
Haimo Technologies 300084.SZChina$667M-31%-7%-12%n/an/an/a
Atlas Energy Solutions AESIUnited States$678M-71%-4%-11%n/an/an/a
Shandong Molong Petroleum Machinery 0568.HKHong Kong$698M-48%+58%0%n/an/an/a
Toyo Engineering 6330.TJapan$711M-16%-31%-10%14.2×-2.1%-0.1%
Hunting HTG.LUnited Kingdom$714M-25%-12%7%14.3×17.8%+9.6%
Calfrac Well Services CFW.TOCanada$506M+36%-15%6%7.2×-10.9%+14.5%
China Oil HBP Science & Technology 002554.SZChina$502M-28%-29%-17%n/an/an/a
Oil States International OISUnited States$499M-4%-1%1%13.5×27.7%+1.0%
HMH HMHUnited States$482M-49%-10%12%3.6×-2.1%+6.7%
Viridien VIRI.PAFrance$763M-16%-14%11%22.9×-2.9%+4.1%
ProPetro PUMPUnited States$785M-59%-6%0%35.1×n/an/a
Forum Energy Technologies FETUnited States$800M+30%+11%7%12.9×3.5%+9.1%
Bomesc Offshore Engineering 603727.SSChina$823M+6%-12%-7%249.4×-9.1%-6.1%
Deep Industries DEEPINDS.NSIndia$433M+38%+41%12%12.5×25.4%+35.7%
Total Energy Services TOT.TOCanada$851M+41%+22%9%9.7×3.7%+23.8%
Flotek Industries FTKUnited States$886M+45%+59%13%21.9×n/an/a
SEAMEC SEAMECLTD.NSIndia$397M-5%+60%24%13.8×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Dalipal's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Nanjing Develop Advanced Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Class 1 (688377.SS), Ashtead Technology (AT..L), ProFrac (ACDC), Haimo Technologies (300084.SZ), Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI), Shandong Molong Petroleum Machinery (0568.HK), Toyo Engineering (6330.T), Hunting (HTG.L).
Is Dalipal expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.5× against a peer median of 14.2×, 7th most expensive of 16 in its peer set.
How has Dalipal stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -29.1% against -15.6% for the median peer; over one year -51.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.