Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1773.TW Shiny Chemical Industrial Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Shiny Chemical Industrial Co., Ltd.1773.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Materials›Chemicals: Specialty

Taiwanese specialty chemicals maker producing resins and related industrial chemical products.

Momentum weak 39
Mkt cap
$1.29B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
38%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.36M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+8.1 pp
WACC 7.1%
Hurdle
-3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
110 days
24 Feb 2027
Close · TWDNT$142.50
1D-3.4%
1W-9.5%
1M-21.1%
3M-8.1%
6M-20.4%
YTD+3.3%
1Y-1.0%
ATR %3.8%
52w lowhigh30.1% off high

What Shiny Chemical Industrial does

Taiwanese specialty chemicals maker producing resins and related industrial chemical products.

Products and services

  • Specialty resins

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Specialty chemicals
  • Resin production

Moat: none

Headquarters: Taiwan

Named competitors

Shiny Chemical Industrial at a glance

Size Shiny Chemical Industrial (1773.TW) is a Taiwan Materials company (Chemicals: Specialty) with a market value of $1.29B, the 224th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$142.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 20.4%, against -22.3% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 19.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.3%); the operating margin is 22.5% (peer median 6.6%).

Valuation It trades at 15.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.7× (7th cheapest of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.1 points above its cost of capital (7.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 24 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20261773.TW 81Peer median 78
Six months, rebased to 100: Shiny Chemical Industrial against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shiny Chemical Industrial financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$13.7BNT$11.5BNT$11.1BNT$9.85BNT$11.3B
Revenue growth—+4%+12%-13%—
Gross profitNT$4.63BNT$3.75BNT$3.36BNT$2.98BNT$3.24B
EBITDANT$3.82BNT$3.08BNT$2.79BNT$2.36BNT$2.49B
Net incomeNT$2.59BNT$2.04BNT$1.80BNT$1.58BNT$1.83B
Free cash flowNT$508MNT$1.28BNT$1.11BNT$225M-NT$279M
Capital expenditureNT$2.30BNT$1.79BNT$1.25BNT$1.92BNT$2.55B
Total debtNT$4.29BNT$3.02BNT$3.57BNT$3.72BNT$3.22B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shiny Chemical Industrial competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%0%300072000990301069DNRREX60058966160009306030786003670023616006184766301216BASF6002736886036886253016301773.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shiny Chemical Industrial is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%0×50×100×300072000990301069DNRREX661660307847663012166886030020531773.TWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shiny Chemical Industrial is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%000990301069REX60307860036760061847666002736886253016301773.TWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Shiny Chemical Industrial is the large dot.

Shiny Chemical Industrial competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (1773.TW vs 4766.TW vs 1717.TW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Shiny Chemical Industrial 1773.TW$1.29B-20%+20%22%15.1×5.5%
Nan Pao Resins Chemical 4766.TW$1.24B-6%+3%16%13.3×-8.7%
Eternal Materials 1717.TW$2.06B-27%-2%5%17.2×19.9%

How Shiny Chemical Industrial compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shiny Chemical Industrial against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1773.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-21.1%-10.1%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-20.4%-22.3%8th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-30.1%-47.6%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+19.6%+5.3%7th highest of 21
Operating margin22.5%6.6%highest of 21
Forward P/E15.1×16.7×7th cheapest of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)5.5%13.2%6th least demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.1%+11.1%2nd lowest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.6 pp+2.4 pp6th least demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.1 pp-2.0 pp3rd highest of 21
EV / EBITDA12.2×8.4×3rd most expensive of 6
Net debt / EBITDA0.9×-0.4×2nd most indebted of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shiny Chemical Industrial 1773.TWTaiwan$1.29B-20%+20%22%15.1×5.5%+8.1%
Beijing Haixin Energy Technology 300072.SZChina$1.30B-20%+61%-9%121.7×n/an/a
Chengzhi 000990.SZChina$1.29B-43%-7%7%10.6×-2.8%+2.2%
Shandong Kaisheng New Materials 301069.SZChina$1.28B-19%+20%13%47.0×29.2%+10.4%
Industrie De Nora DNR.MIItaly$1.31B-23%-2%14%16.0×n/an/a
REX American Resources REXUnited States$1.31B-21%+6%15%26.2×-3.8%+11.7%
Dawei Technology (Guangdong) 600589.SSChina$1.32B-38%+29%-10%n/an/an/a
Global New Material International 6616.HKHong Kong$1.32B-3%+165%0%14.1×n/an/a
COFCO Biotechnology 000930.SZChina$1.32B-21%-9%-2%n/an/an/a
Jiangyin Jianghua Micro-electronics Materials 603078.SSChina$1.33B-7%+18%7%79.3×32.0%+17.0%
Guizhou Redstar Developing 600367.SSChina$1.25B+14%+1%7%n/a26.8%+9.1%
Anhui Shenjian New Materials 002361.SZChina$1.25B-54%-4%-3%n/an/an/a
Shanghai Chlor-Alkali Chemical 600618.SSChina$1.24B-29%+2%6%n/a-0.4%+9.9%
Nan Pao Resins Chemical 4766.TWTaiwan$1.24B-6%+3%16%13.3×-8.7%+8.3%
Wankai New Materials 301216.SZChina$1.35B-48%+5%4%8.3×n/an/a
BASF India BASF.NSIndia$1.35B-23%+13%4%17.4×n/an/a
Zhejiang Jiahua Energy Chemical Industry 600273.SSChina$1.23B-22%+4%5%7.8×-6.3%+12.9%
Shanghai Skychem Technology 688603.SSChina$1.22B-29%+38%19%44.6×n/an/a
GCH Technology 688625.SSChina$1.38B-32%+8%18%19.2×27.6%+16.3%
Yunnan Energy Investment 002053.SZChina$1.21B-24%-24%20%11.6×n/an/a
Tongyu Advanced Materials (Guangdong) 301630.SZChina$1.21B-19%+26%18%n/a35.9%+26.0%

Questions

Who are Shiny Chemical Industrial's main competitors?
Named competitors: Nan Pao Resins Chemical (4766.TW), Eternal Materials (1717.TW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Beijing Haixin Energy Technology (300072.SZ), Chengzhi (000990.SZ), Shandong Kaisheng New Materials (301069.SZ), Industrie De Nora (DNR.MI), REX American Resources (REX), Dawei Technology (Guangdong) (600589.SS).
Is Shiny Chemical Industrial expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.1× against a peer median of 16.7×, 7th cheapest of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Shiny Chemical Industrial stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -20.4% against -22.3% for the median peer; over one year -1.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.