Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 161000.KS Aekyung Chemical Co., LtdOpen in the cockpit ↗

Aekyung Chemical Co., Ltd161000.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Materials›Chemicals: Specialty
Momentum strong 64
Mkt cap
$326M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
30%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.04M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-2.9 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · KRW₩9,200
1D-4.2%
1W-6.1%
1M-15.0%
3M+7.5%
6M-40.8%
YTD-3.2%
1Y-20.4%
ATR %7.7%
52w lowhigh53.9% off high

What Aekyung Chemical does

Employees: 716

Aekyung Chemical at a glance

Size Aekyung Chemical (161000.KS) is a South Korea Materials company (Chemicals: Specialty) with a market value of $326M, the 442nd largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩9,200 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 40.8%, against -23.2% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 3.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.3%); the operating margin is 2.3% (peer median 1.8%).

Valuation It trades at 0.6× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.7× (cheapest of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.9 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 77161000.KS 61
Six months, rebased to 100: Aekyung Chemical against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Aekyung Chemical financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩1.58T₩1.45T₩1.64T₩1.79T₩2.18T
Revenue growth—-12%-8%-18%—
Gross profit₩152B₩107B₩130B₩167B₩213B
EBITDA₩84.5B₩41.9B₩53.0B₩80.6B₩128B
Net income₩20.0B-₩2.95B₩3.98B₩33.1B₩60.1B
Free cash flow-₩84.3B-₩70.3B-₩73.9B-₩531M₩73.7B
Capital expenditure₩117B₩105B₩138B₩85.1B₩63.4B
Total debt₩587B₩505B₩397B₩339B₩250B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Aekyung Chemical competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-30%-20%-10%PCR00213617273007164109688353600319TRUALT0024426309603172300637GEVOSTYRENIXKIRIINDUS4970603722300538161000.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Aekyung Chemical is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%2×4×PCR0021361727300716688353600319TRUALT3003400024426309603172300637301258GEVOKIRIINDUS4970603722300538161000.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Aekyung Chemical is the large dot.

Aekyung Chemical competitors and peer comparison

How Aekyung Chemical compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Aekyung Chemical against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure161000.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-15.0%-15.1%11th highest of 21
6-month return-40.8%-23.2%2nd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-53.9%-45.7%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+3.2%+8.3%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin2.3%1.8%11th highest of 21
EV / Sales0.6×1.7×cheapest of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.9 pp-6.7 pp8th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA11.3×8.1×3rd most expensive of 9
Net debt / EBITDA6.0×2.0×2nd most indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Aekyung Chemical 161000.KSSouth Korea$326M-41%+3%2%0.6×n/an/a
PCC Rokita Spolka Akcyjna PCR.WAPoland$327M-7%-6%3%1.0×16.1%+4.1%
Anhui Annada Titanium Industry 002136.SZChina$327M-33%+12%2%1.3×n/an/a
Chung Hwa Chemical Industrial Works 1727.TWTaiwan$325M-4%+5%5%5.5×n/an/a
Guangdong Quanwei Technology 300716.SZChina$331M+2%+47%-333%24.4×n/an/a
Stella Chemifa 4109.TJapan$332M-22%+4%12%1.2×6.5%+2.3%
Jiangsu HSC New Energy Materials 688353.SSChina$332M-35%+153%39%1.1×n/an/a
Weifang Yaxing Chemical 600319.SSChina$320M-32%-5%-10%4.6×n/an/a
Trualt Bioenergy TRUALT.NSIndia$320M-26%-5%14%1.7×n/an/a
Jiangmen Kanhoo Industry 300340.SZChina$318M-31%+20%-7%1.2×51.6%+4.7%
Longxing Technology 002442.SZChina$335M-27%+7%1%0.9×n/an/a
Tomoe Engineering 6309.TJapan$336M+3%+2%9%0.7×n/an/a
Zhejiang Wanfeng Chemical 603172.SSChina$338M-22%+17%11%3.3×n/an/a
Yangfan New Materials (Zhejiang) 300637.SZChina$314M-19%+3%1%2.8×57.5%+13.4%
Suzhou Fushilai Pharmaceutical 301258.SZChina$313M-21%-15%-13%2.7×n/an/a
Gevo GEVOUnited States$344M-24%+121%-30%2.6×n/an/a
Styrenix Performance Materials STYRENIX.NSIndia$345M-20%+10%9%1.0×17.4%+16.1%
Kiri Industries KIRIINDUS.NSIndia$345M+16%+11%-25%3.4×n/an/a
Toyo Gosei 4970.TJapan$346M-55%+16%12%1.7×15.9%+9.1%
Wuxi Acryl Technology 603722.SSChina$346M-37%+34%-15%3.7×n/an/a
Shenzhen Tongyi Industry 300538.SZChina$307M-31%-16%-2%1.0×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Aekyung Chemical's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: PCC Rokita Spolka Akcyjna (PCR.WA), Anhui Annada Titanium Industry (002136.SZ), Chung Hwa Chemical Industrial Works (1727.TW), Guangdong Quanwei Technology (300716.SZ), Stella Chemifa (4109.T), Jiangsu HSC New Energy Materials (688353.SS), Weifang Yaxing Chemical (600319.SS), Trualt Bioenergy (TRUALT.NS).
Is Aekyung Chemical expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.6× against a peer median of 1.7×, cheapest of 21 in its peer set.
How has Aekyung Chemical stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -40.8% against -23.2% for the median peer; over one year -20.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.