Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 137400.KS People & Technology, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

People & Technology, Inc.137400.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Materials›Other Metals/Minerals
Momentum weak 22
Mkt cap
$408M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
75%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.46M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
6.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.6 pp
WACC 6.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
11 days
17 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩23,900
1D-5.2%
1W-7.7%
1M-26.0%
3M-23.5%
6M-57.3%
YTD-36.4%
1Y-49.6%
ATR %7.3%
52w lowhigh61.5% off high

What People & Technology does

Employees: 591

People & Technology at a glance

Size People & Technology (137400.KS) is a South Korea Materials company (Other Metals/Minerals) with a market value of $408M, the 387th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩23,900 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 57.3%, against -34.1% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 18.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +35.9%); the operating margin is 10.6% (peer median 0.4%).

Valuation It trades at 6.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.0× (3rd cheapest of 6).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.6 points below its cost of capital (6.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

40608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 65137400.KS 41
Six months, rebased to 100: People & Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

People & Technology financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩699B₩745B₩1.04T₩545B₩418B
Revenue growth—-28%+90%+31%—
Gross profit₩149B₩159B₩230B₩128B₩120B
EBITDA₩89.8B₩108B₩174B₩82.5B₩81.3B
Net income₩83.3B₩74.3B₩142B₩69.8B₩60.2B
Free cash flow-₩29.2B-₩123B-₩33.8B-₩166B-₩21.9B
Capital expenditure₩100B₩128B₩73.5B₩126B₩57.8B
Total debt₩494B₩312B₩174B₩131B₩81.3B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

People & Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%WA1BOEREGARA603527ASHAPURMINUAMYNBG6MTMQALOYNICUCAML001296PMET001396600281300056TTSLZM137400.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. People & Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+200%+400%0×25×50×75×BOE603527UAMYG6MCAML137400.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. People & Technology is the large dot.

People & Technology competitors and peer comparison

How People & Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

People & Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure137400.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-26.0%-14.8%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-57.3%-34.1%2nd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-61.5%-53.1%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-18.3%+35.9%lowest of 14
Operating margin10.6%0.4%4th highest of 14
Forward P/E6.8×16.0×3rd cheapest of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.6 pp-17.0 pp4th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA9.1×7.8×2nd most expensive of 5
Net debt / EBITDA2.8×-0.5×most indebted of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
People & Technology 137400.KSSouth Korea$408M-57%-18%11%6.8×n/an/a
WA1 Resources WA1.AXAustralia$410M-51%n/an/an/an/an/a
Boss Energy BOE.AXAustralia$403M0%+100%8%16.1×18.7%+99.8%
Regulus Resources REG.VCanada$402M+15%n/an/an/an/an/a
Aclara Resources ARA.TOCanada$402M-50%n/an/an/an/an/a
Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials 603527.SSChina$396M-36%+59%0%16.0×n/an/a
Ashapura Minechem ASHAPURMIN.NSIndia$421M-37%+63%8%n/a13.3%+35.5%
United States Antimony UAMYUnited States$422M-74%+36%-65%82.2×n/an/a
NioCorp Developments NBUnited States$423M-52%n/an/an/an/an/a
Group 6 Metals G6M.AXAustralia$424M-9%+508%50%6.2×-9.7%n/a
Trilogy Metals TMQ.TOCanada$391M-50%n/an/an/an/an/a
REalloys ALOYUnited States$427M-38%+21%-4,460%n/an/an/a
Magna Mining NICU.TOCanada$429M-15%+299%-34%n/an/an/a
Central Asia Metals CAML.LUnited Kingdom$430M-17%+23%39%4.3×-9.5%+6.9%
Chongqing Changjiang River Moulding Material (Group) 001296.SZChina$430M-16%-1%7%n/a14.0%+4.2%
PMET Resources PMET.TOCanada$431M-56%n/an/an/an/an/a
Shanghai Re.fine Environment Sci-tech 001396.SZChina$433M-42%+4%12%n/a27.1%+10.6%
Shanxi Huayang New Material 600281.SSChina$385M-11%+10%-20%n/an/an/a
Xiamen Zhongchuang Environmental Technology 300056.SZChina$434M-32%-12%-41%n/an/an/a
Tintina Mines TTS.VCanada$380M+219%n/an/an/an/an/a
Lifezone Metals LZMUnited States$378M-30%+652%-850%n/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are People & Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: WA1 Resources (WA1.AX), Boss Energy (BOE.AX), Regulus Resources (REG.V), Aclara Resources (ARA.TO), Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials (603527.SS), Ashapura Minechem (ASHAPURMIN.NS), United States Antimony (UAMY), NioCorp Developments (NB).
Is People & Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 6.8× against a peer median of 16.0×, 3rd cheapest of 6 in its peer set.
How has People & Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -57.3% against -34.1% for the median peer; over one year -49.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.