Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 092870.KS Exicon Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Exicon Co., Ltd.092870.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Information Technology›Electronic Equipment/Instruments
Momentum leader 99
Mkt cap
$383M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
58%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$22.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
36.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.7 pp
WACC 9.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · KRW₩41,600
1D-9.9%
1W-31.5%
1M-21.4%
3M+187.9%
6M+13.3%
YTD+175.1%
1Y+167.7%
ATR %16.6%
52w lowhigh38.6% off high

What Exicon does

Employees: 179

Exicon at a glance

Size Exicon (092870.KS) is a South Korea Information Technology company (Electronic Equipment/Instruments) with a market value of $383M, the 406th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩41,600 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 13.3%, against -25.4% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 273.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.5%); the operating margin is 11.1% (peer median 6.2%).

Valuation It trades at 36.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.0× (2nd most expensive of 11).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.7 points below its cost of capital (9.1% WACC).

Relative performance

5010015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026092870.KS 108Peer median 74
Six months, rebased to 100: Exicon against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Exicon financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩97.8B₩66.0B₩31.6B₩82.3B₩91.2B
Revenue growth—+109%-62%-10%—
Gross profit₩32.2B₩19.0B₩5.55B₩27.2B₩29.3B
EBITDA₩14.0B₩3.00B-₩13.3B₩3.72B₩11.8B
Net income₩20.8B₩8.96B-₩1.36B₩4.89B₩15.2B
Free cash flow-₩5.45B-₩6.79B-₩17.4B₩17.0B-₩6.14B
Capital expenditure₩4.38B₩3.43B₩2.52B₩4.28B₩3.82B
Total debt₩23.2B₩16.6B₩7.37B₩8.00B₩8.00B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Exicon competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-40%-20%0%62173013613002663004273000253003062535906880567715LUCE0022786005600031603002753001126742092870.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Exicon is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%20×40×60×62172535906880567715LUCEGENO22350031603002756742092870.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Exicon is the large dot.

Exicon competitors and peer comparison

How Exicon compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Exicon against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure092870.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-21.4%-13.5%8th lowest of 21
6-month return+13.3%-25.4%2nd highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-38.6%-45.0%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+273.1%+5.5%highest of 21
Operating margin11.1%6.2%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E36.9×15.0×2nd most expensive of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.7 pp-2.0 pp10th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA35.9×12.5×4th most expensive of 9
Net debt / EBITDA-1.3×0.3×5th least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Exicon 092870.KSSouth Korea$383M+13%+273%11%36.9×n/an/a
C.C.P. Contact Probes 6217.TWOTaiwan$383M-63%+26%-3%24.3×n/an/a
SmartGen (Zhengzhou) Technology 301361.SZChina$380M-19%+22%27%n/a9.0%+10.6%
Xingyuan Environment Technology 300266.SZChina$378M-33%-27%-22%n/an/an/a
Red Phase 300427.SZChina$391M-53%+13%-15%n/a36.9%-13.7%
Hangzhou Huaxing Chuangye Communication Technology 300025.SZChina$373M-15%-16%-24%n/a36.0%-6.5%
Hangzhou Everfine Photo-E-Info 300306.SZChina$394M-23%-3%10%n/a11.2%+0.2%
NEOSEM 253590.KSSouth Korea$369M-37%-31%5%13.0×n/an/a
Beijing Labtech Instruments 688056.SSChina$368M-1%0%5%66.2×34.7%+2.8%
Nagano Keiki 7715.TJapan$364M+1%+2%11%8.1×-0.4%+8.6%
Luceco LUCE.LUnited Kingdom$403M-16%+11%11%10.8×7.8%+9.0%
Shanghai Sk Petroleum & Chemical Equipment 002278.SZChina$404M-31%+2%6%n/a13.7%+3.7%
Beijing AriTime Intelligent Control 600560.SSChina$359M-26%+33%4%n/an/an/a
General Oceans GENO.OLNorway$359M-32%+34%13%18.1×-1.9%+34.3%
Ceyear Technologies 301689.SZChina$411Mn/a+17%13%n/an/an/a
Hefei Gocom Information Technology 688367.SSChina$357M-33%-10%-1%n/a55.8%-1.3%
MicroTech Medical (Hangzhou) 2235.HKHong Kong$354M-15%+95%8%26.7×3.5%+53.2%
DI Corporation 003160.KSSouth Korea$415M-25%+40%21%9.4×-11.4%+21.6%
Chongqing MAS Science & Technology 300275.SZChina$351M-28%-13%6%17.1×35.3%+9.0%
Shenzhen Maxonic Automation Control 300112.SZChina$350M-13%-6%-2%n/an/an/a
Kyosan Electric Manufacturing 6742.TJapan$350M+26%+9%7%8.3×2.0%+8.4%

Questions

Which companies are Exicon's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: C.C.P. Contact Probes (6217.TWO), SmartGen (Zhengzhou) Technology (301361.SZ), Xingyuan Environment Technology (300266.SZ), Red Phase (300427.SZ), Hangzhou Huaxing Chuangye Communication Technology (300025.SZ), Hangzhou Everfine Photo-E-Info (300306.SZ), NEOSEM (253590.KS), Beijing Labtech Instruments (688056.SS).
Is Exicon expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 36.9× against a peer median of 15.0×, 2nd most expensive of 11 in its peer set.
How has Exicon stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +13.3% against -25.4% for the median peer; over one year +167.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.