Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 0148.HK Kingboard Holdings LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Kingboard Holdings Limited0148.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Materials›Chemicals: Specialty

Hong Kong conglomerate and one of the world's largest makers of copper-clad laminates and printed circuit boards, plus chemicals and property.

≈ An Asian PCB-materials maker with a property arm attachedMomentum weak 28
Mkt cap
$5.78B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
66%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$110M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
5.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+1.1 pp
WACC 5.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
136 days
22 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$40.40
1D-5.5%
1W-8.2%
1M-33.5%
3M-14.3%
6M-16.9%
YTD+37.6%
1Y+45.1%
ATR %8.6%
52w lowhigh73.4% off high

What Kingboard does

Hong Kong conglomerate and one of the world's largest makers of copper-clad laminates and printed circuit boards, plus chemicals and property.

Integrated from the raw inputs, glass fabric, copper foil and resin, up to laminates and finished boards, so it can supply other board makers while also making its own. Its laminates arm is separately listed. The Cheung family controls the group.

In one line: An Asian PCB-materials maker with a property arm attached.

Products and services

  • Copper-clad laminates (CCL)
  • Printed circuit boards (PCBs)
  • Specialty chemicals
  • Property investment/development

Customers

  • PCB fabricators
  • Electronics OEMs
  • Property tenants/buyers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Electronics materials & chemicals
  • Copper-clad laminate & PCB…
  • CCL, PCBs, specialty chemicals…

What could go right

  • AI server/data-center PCB content growth

What could go wrong

  • Cyclical PCB/electronics demand
  • Copper/resin input cost swings

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). One of the world's largest CCL producers by volume, giving cost/scale advantages in a cyclical materials business.

Headquarters: Hong Kong · Founded: 1988 · Employees: 34,000

Named competitors

Kingboard at a glance

Size Kingboard (0148.HK) is a Hong Kong Materials company (Chemicals: Specialty) with a market value of $5.78B, the 239th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$40.40 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 16.9%, against -8.4% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 19.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.6%); the operating margin is 14.7% (peer median 14.6%).

Valuation It trades at 5.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.4× (cheapest of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.1 points above its cost of capital (5.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 22 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 910148.HK 78
Six months, rebased to 100: Kingboard against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Kingboard financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$52.9BHK$45.4BHK$43.1BHK$39.7BHK$49.4B
Revenue growth—+5%+9%-20%—
Gross profitHK$11.6BHK$7.93BHK$8.49BHK$7.59BHK$12.4B
EBITDAHK$10.3BHK$6.68BHK$6.40BHK$5.18BHK$10.5B
Net incomeHK$4.53BHK$4.40BHK$1.63BHK$2.06BHK$3.66B
Free cash flown/a-HK$954MHK$431M-HK$121MHK$5.49B
Capital expendituren/aHK$3.92BHK$4.22BHK$4.14BHK$5.29B
Total debtn/aHK$22.8BHK$21.7BHK$22.9BHK$19.8B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kingboard competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%0%4021600352COROMANDEL601216300390002601300037FLUOROCHEMLINDEINDIA603260600378NEUSOLMXCE4005NAVINFLUORCRDADESN6036500148.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kingboard is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%+100%0×50×100×4021600352COROMANDEL601216300390002601300037FLUOROCHEMLINDEINDIA603260600378SOLMXCENAVINFLUORDESN6036500148.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kingboard is the large dot.

Kingboard competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (0148.HK vs 600183.SS vs 1303.TW vs 2383.TW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Kingboard 0148.HK$5.78B-17%+19%15%5.0×n/a
Shengyi Technology 600183.SS$25.7B-8%+56%22%20.3×20.5%
Nan Ya Plastic 1303.TW$57.4B+155%+6%6%11.5×n/a
Elite Material 2383.TW$41.4B-19%+89%26%15.8×n/a
Rogers ROG$2.17B-13%+7%10%26.2×10.3%

How Kingboard compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kingboard against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure0148.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-33.5%+0.3%lowest of 21
6-month return-16.9%-8.4%6th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-73.4%-29.5%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+19.4%+10.6%9th highest of 21
Operating margin14.7%14.6%11th highest of 21
Forward P/E5.0×22.4×cheapest of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.1 pp-0.1 pp9th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA5.2×14.3×2nd cheapest of 13
Net debt / EBITDA0.1×1.3×3rd least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Kingboard 0148.HKHong Kong$5.78B-17%+19%15%5.0×n/an/a
Nissan Chemical 4021.TJapan$5.72B0%+10%23%15.9×9.3%+6.0%
Zhejiang Longsheng 600352.SSChina$5.70B-11%-1%19%13.7×-5.2%-3.1%
Coromandel International COROMANDEL.NSIndia$5.69B-7%+24%8%27.3×n/an/a
Inner Mongolia Junzheng Energy & Chemical 601216.SSChina$5.92B-16%+3%11%12.0×-3.4%+11.3%
Canmax Technologies 300390.SZChina$5.62B-64%+98%27%7.3×n/an/a
LB Group Co., Ltd. Class A 002601.SZChina$5.58B-8%+7%7%22.4×5.0%+12.9%
Shenzhen Capchem Technology 300037.SZChina$6.16B-21%+72%13%19.0×19.3%+26.6%
Gujarat Fluorochemicals FLUOROCHEM.NSIndia$5.42B+23%+20%17%53.0×n/an/a
Linde India LINDEINDIA.NSIndia$6.20B-13%+13%22%97.2×47.9%+11.5%
Hoshine Silicon Industry 603260.SSChina$5.32B-33%-7%-6%41.7×22.5%+18.5%
Haohua Chemical Science & Technology 600378.SSChina$6.29B-9%+20%9%22.1×11.0%+25.2%
NewMarket NEUUnited States$6.39B+1%+1%20%n/a-0.8%+6.3%
SOL SOL.MIItaly$6.39B+6%+9%14%30.5×16.9%+12.8%
Methanex MX.TOCanada$5.18B+12%+31%23%6.9×-9.4%+7.1%
Celanese CEUnited States$5.10B-19%+1%9%7.6×5.3%+11.0%
Sumitomo Chemical 4005.TJapan$4.93B-7%-2%5%6.9×1.1%+0.4%
Navin Fluorine International NAVINFLUOR.NSIndia$4.89B+27%+46%30%45.6×34.0%+22.7%
Croda International CRDA.LUnited Kingdom$6.88B+31%+3%16%23.3×19.9%+4.1%
Dottikon ES DESN.SWSwitzerland$4.72B-24%+11%27%37.6×12.6%+14.4%
Red Avenue New Materials 603650.SSChina$4.70B-12%+24%9%40.7×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Kingboard's main competitors?
Named competitors: Shengyi Technology (600183.SS), Nan Ya Plastics (1303.TW), Elite Material (2383.TW), Rogers Corporation (ROG). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Nissan Chemical (4021.T), Zhejiang Longsheng (600352.SS), Coromandel International (COROMANDEL.NS), Inner Mongolia Junzheng Energy & Chemical (601216.SS), Canmax Technologies (300390.SZ), LB Group Co., Ltd. Class A (002601.SZ).
Is Kingboard expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 5.0× against a peer median of 22.4×, cheapest of 20 in its peer set.
How has Kingboard stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -16.9% against -8.4% for the median peer; over one year +45.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.