Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 006340.KS Daewon Cable Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Daewon Cable Co., Ltd.006340.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Industrials›Electrical Products
Momentum laggard 9
Mkt cap
$457M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
69%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.82M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-7.0 pp
WACC 11.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · KRW₩7,710
1D-6.4%
1W-18.6%
1M-40.5%
3M-44.1%
6M-48.8%
YTD+107.3%
1Y+142.4%
ATR %9.1%
52w lowhigh62.0% off high

What Daewon Cable does

Employees: 156

Daewon Cable at a glance

Size Daewon Cable (006340.KS) is a South Korea Industrials company (Electrical Products) with a market value of $457M, the 354th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩7,710 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 48.8%, against -28.7% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 37.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.9%); the operating margin is 1.8% (peer median 0.8%).

Valuation It trades at 0.8× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.9× (5th cheapest of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.0 points below its cost of capital (11.6% WACC).

Relative performance

40608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 69006340.KS 44
Six months, rebased to 100: Daewon Cable against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Daewon Cable financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩789B₩625B₩553B₩515B₩562B
Revenue growth—+13%+7%-8%—
Gross profit₩32.4B₩30.1B₩32.6B₩27.4B₩15.4B
EBITDA₩21.6B₩17.0B₩17.5B₩16.4B₩4.58B
Net income₩12.6B₩8.78B₩6.79B₩9.61B₩1.35B
Free cash flow-₩23.5B-₩35.4B₩2.79B-₩7.55B₩28.7B
Capital expenditure₩5.52B₩5.30B₩1.21B₩1.66B₩3.15B
Total debt₩72.8B₩26.9B₩27.9B₩31.9B₩32.9B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Daewon Cable competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-20%0%6031096001923012267788996368871749600819002347661700245168103012386052590029276050663004145208006340.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Daewon Cable is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%+80%0×10×603109600192301226778899636887174960081966173008903009333004145208006340.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Daewon Cable is the large dot.

Daewon Cable competitors and peer comparison

How Daewon Cable compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Daewon Cable against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure006340.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-40.5%-10.1%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-48.8%-28.7%2nd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-62.0%-45.9%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+37.7%+5.9%5th highest of 21
Operating margin1.8%0.8%10th highest of 21
EV / Sales0.8×1.9×5th cheapest of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-7.0 pp-4.7 pp7th lowest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA0.8×0.2×4th most indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Daewon Cable 006340.KSSouth Korea$457M-49%+38%2%0.8×n/an/a
Senci Electric Machinery 603109.SSChina$460M-33%-3%4%1.0×18.1%+13.4%
Lanzhou Greatwall Electrcal 600192.SSChina$453M-17%-6%-23%3.0×n/an/a
Changzhou Xiangming Intelligent Drive System 301226.SZChina$450M-29%+4%1%4.8×38.8%-1.6%
Song Chuan Precision 7788.TWTaiwan$467M+15%+34%9%2.3×n/an/a
Transtech Optelecom Science 9963.HKHong Kong$467M+63%+76%-3%18.2×54.9%-18.2%
SolaX Power Network Technology (Zhejiang) 688717.SSChina$468M-68%+57%0%0.5×n/an/a
Cheng Mei Materials Technology 4960.TWTaiwan$470M-36%-7%-14%1.9×n/an/a
Tianneng Power International 0819.HKHong Kong$470M-47%+6%1%0.2×-1.3%-0.6%
Taier Heavy Industry 002347.SZChina$471M-22%-1%-7%2.9×18.1%+6.1%
Takaoka Toko 6617.TJapan$443M-40%+6%9%0.5×2.3%+4.0%
Shanghai Morn Electric Equipment 002451.SZChina$443M-30%-4%2%2.5×n/an/a
Maxell 6810.TJapan$474M+2%+6%6%0.6×-1.1%-1.4%
Jiangsu Ruitai New Energy Materials 301238.SZChina$474M-34%+50%-5%n/an/an/a
Lutian Machinery 605259.SSChina$441M-15%0%7%0.9×n/an/a
Shanghai XFH Technology 300890.SZChina$475M-35%+52%7%2.7×n/an/a
Guizhou Taiyong-Changzheng Technology 002927.SZChina$439M-28%-3%-3%3.6×56.9%+1.7%
Sinostar Cable 300933.SZChina$477M-29%+13%0%1.3×n/an/a
Zhejiang Tengen Electrics 605066.SSChina$477M-21%-3%0%1.0×n/an/a
Sichuan Zhongguang Lightning Protection Technologies 300414.SZChina$478M-31%+21%3%4.7×n/an/a
Arisawa Mfg.Co 5208.TJapan$437M-24%+18%10%1.2×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Daewon Cable's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Senci Electric Machinery (603109.SS), Lanzhou Greatwall Electrcal (600192.SS), Changzhou Xiangming Intelligent Drive System (301226.SZ), Song Chuan Precision (7788.TW), Transtech Optelecom Science (9963.HK), SolaX Power Network Technology (Zhejiang) (688717.SS), Cheng Mei Materials Technology (4960.TW), Tianneng Power International (0819.HK).
Is Daewon Cable expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.8× against a peer median of 1.9×, 5th cheapest of 20 in its peer set.
How has Daewon Cable stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -48.8% against -28.7% for the median peer; over one year +142.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.