Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 003031.SZ Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology Co. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology Co. Ltd. Class A003031.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Electrical Products

Makes electronic ceramic packages for optical-communication and laser devices, plus gallium-nitride base-station RF chips and silicon-carbide power modules.

≈ A Chinese electronics-packaging materials makerMomentum laggard 15
Mkt cap
$5.62B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
24%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$93.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
36.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.2 pp
WACC 12.8%
Hurdle
+6 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
161 days
16 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥83.04
1D-4.2%
1W+3.4%
1M-24.9%
3M-8.9%
6M-32.8%
YTD+13.5%
1Y+51.5%
ATR %8.3%
52w lowhigh59.7% off high

What Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology does

Makes electronic ceramic packages for optical-communication and laser devices, plus gallium-nitride base-station RF chips and silicon-carbide power modules.

Sells ceramic housings that package and protect optical, laser and power chips to device makers, and also gallium-nitride radio chips and silicon-carbide modules added through its parent, a research institute of state group CETC. The ceramic packages are the long-standing core and the chip lines the newer addition.

In one line: A Chinese electronics-packaging materials maker.

Products and services

  • Electronic ceramic packages (communications, industrial lase
  • GaN base-station RF chips and devices
  • SiC power modules
  • Ceramic substrates and precision ceramic parts
  • Automotive electronic parts

Customers

  • Optical-module and communications-device makers
  • Base-station equipment makers
  • Industrial-laser makers
  • Consumer-electronics makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Electronic components and compound…
  • Ceramic packages, GaN RF chips, SiC…

What could go right

  • Optical-communication and data-center demand for ceramic packages
  • GaN chips for communications base stations

What could go wrong

  • Dependence on communications-equipment cycles
  • Competition from Japanese ceramic-package makers

Moat: narrow (process know-how, IP / patents). Own alumina and aluminium-nitride ceramic and metallization technology, backed by its CETC research-institute parent.

Headquarters: Shijiazhuang, China · Founded: 2009 · Employees: 860

Named competitors

Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology at a glance

Size Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology (003031.SZ) is a China Industrials company (Electrical Products) with a market value of $5.62B, the 447th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥83.04 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 32.8%, against -32.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 43.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.9%); the operating margin is 18.9% (peer median 9.0%).

Valuation It trades at 36.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 21.6× (6th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 35% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +29%, so the hurdle is +6 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.2 points above its cost of capital (12.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 65003031.SZ 65
Six months, rebased to 100: Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥4.15BCN¥2.87BCN¥2.63BCN¥2.66BCN¥2.50B
Revenue growth—+9%-1%+6%—
Gross profitCN¥1.53BCN¥1.00BCN¥889MCN¥892MCN¥871M
EBITDAn/aCN¥816MCN¥727MCN¥695MCN¥627M
Net incomeCN¥748MCN¥563MCN¥539MCN¥490MCN¥457M
Free cash flowCN¥381MCN¥468MCN¥116MCN¥107MCN¥243M
Capital expenditureCN¥745MCN¥507MCN¥457MCN¥438MCN¥351M
Total debtCN¥503MCN¥387MCN¥302MCN¥543MCN¥459M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-20%0%SUZLON3002856506600580300207FPSENSGTESNEX002409603806300001603606002074301358POWL2475400028511519600869003031.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%20×40×60×SUZLON3002856506600580300207FPSENSGTESNEX002409603806300001002074301358POWL2475400028511519600869003031.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%+40%0%20%40%SUZLON3002856506600580ENSGTESNEX0024096038063000016036061519600869003031.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology is the large dot.

Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (003031.SZ vs 6971.T vs 300408.SZ vs 5334.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology 003031.SZ$5.62B-33%+43%19%36.1×34.9%
Kyocera 6971.T$23.4B+3%+7%6%22.5×21.3%
Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) 300408.SZ$21.6B-15%+65%34%28.1×23.7%
Niterra 5334.T$9.01B+5%+16%19%9.9×4.0%
Maruwa 5344.T$3.12B-46%+26%36%19.5×n/a
Qorvo QRVOn/a+45%n/an/an/an/a

How Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure003031.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-24.9%-17.5%9th lowest of 21
6-month return-32.8%-32.4%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-59.7%-54.3%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+43.3%+6.9%4th highest of 21
Operating margin18.9%9.0%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E36.1×21.6×6th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)34.9%14.1%3rd most demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+28.6%+12.8%3rd highest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+6.3 pp-4.0 pp5th most demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.2 pp-2.3 pp6th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology 003031.SZChina$5.62B-33%+43%19%36.1×34.9%+28.6%
Suzlon Energy SUZLON.NSIndia$5.65B-30%+34%15%21.2×34.0%+37.9%
Shandong Sinocera Functional Material 300285.SZChina$5.67B+8%+23%14%48.6×40.1%+12.6%
Yaskawa Electric 6506.TJapan$5.71B-38%+6%8%19.7×24.8%+6.8%
Wolong Electric 600580.SSChina$5.39B-39%-11%4%39.6×25.2%+4.2%
Sunwoda Electronic 300207.SZChina$5.37B-33%+36%-1%16.0×n/an/a
Forgent Power Solutions FPSUnited States$5.93B-52%+89%14%14.4×n/an/a
EnerSys ENSUnited States$5.30B-36%+4%15%11.3×0.5%+4.7%
Gates Industrial GTESUnited States$6.05B-8%+4%16%12.8×9.7%+4.3%
Nexans NEX.PAFrance$6.06B-26%-13%6%17.2×5.6%+5.5%
Jiangsu Yoke Technology 002409.SZChina$6.12B+1%+7%15%32.1×26.4%+30.6%
HANGZHOU FIRST APPLIED MATERIAL 603806.SSChina$5.14B-30%-9%9%22.0×7.5%+13.1%
Qingdao TGOOD Electric 300001.SZChina$4.97B+6%+14%9%21.9×12.0%+16.2%
Ningbo Orient Wires & Cables 603606.SSChina$4.96B-23%+36%12%21.1×3.6%+16.5%
Gotion High-tech 002074.SZChina$6.45B-32%+54%3%25.6×n/an/a
Hunan Yuneng New Energy Battery Material 301358.SZChina$6.46B-50%+130%9%7.8×n/an/a
Powell Industries POWLUnited States$4.85B-57%+7%20%21.2×11.2%+16.3%
Ecopro BM 247540.KSSouth Korea$6.53B-60%-4%6%965.8×n/an/a
Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical 002851.SZChina$6.55B-38%+29%1%60.9×n/an/a
Fortune Electric 1519.TWTaiwan$4.75B-50%+5%21%26.0×16.1%+23.6%
Far East Smarter Energy 600869.SSChina$4.73B-16%-1%1%37.4×38.2%+7.3%

Questions

Who are Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Kyocera (6971.T), Chaozhou Three-Circle (300408.SZ), Niterra (5334.T), Maruwa (5344.T), Qorvo (QRVO). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Suzlon Energy (SUZLON.NS), Shandong Sinocera Functional Material (300285.SZ), Yaskawa Electric (6506.T), Wolong Electric (600580.SS), Sunwoda Electronic (300207.SZ), Forgent Power Solutions (FPS).
Is Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 36.1× against a peer median of 21.6×, 6th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 35% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +29%, so the hurdle is +6 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Hebei Sinopack Electronic Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -32.8% against -32.4% for the median peer; over one year +51.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.