Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002901.SZ Double Medical Technology, Inc. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Double Medical Technology, Inc. Class A002901.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Health Care›Medical Specialties

Chinese orthopedic implant maker selling spine, trauma and joint-replacement devices to hospitals.

≈ A Chinese Stryker Orthopaedics/Zimmer BiometMomentum leader 85
Mkt cap
$2.56B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
36%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.66M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
25.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+18.7 pp
WACC 7.6%
Hurdle
-2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
168 days
23 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥42.30
1D-0.2%
1W+5.0%
1M+6.8%
3M-0.9%
6M-2.5%
YTD-10.7%
1Y-18.5%
ATR %2.9%
52w lowhigh24.5% off high

What Double Medical Technology does

Chinese orthopedic implant maker selling spine, trauma and joint-replacement devices to hospitals.

Sells through distributors to hospitals, and government-run volume-based procurement for orthopaedic implants has cut prices in exchange for guaranteed volumes, which favours low-cost domestic makers over imports. Surgeons' familiarity with an implant system and training from the maker help repeat orders.

In one line: A Chinese Stryker Orthopaedics/Zimmer Biomet.

Products and services

  • Spine implants
  • Trauma fixation devices
  • Joint replacement implants

Customers

  • Orthopedic surgeons/hospitals

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Health Care
  • Medical devices
  • Orthopedic implants

What could go right

  • China orthopedic procedure-volume growth
  • Import substitution

What could go wrong

  • Volume-based procurement price cuts

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, switching costs). Device registration and surgeon training create moderate switching costs.

Headquarters: Xiamen, Fujian, China · Employees: 4,704

Named competitors

Double Medical Technology at a glance

Size Double Medical Technology (002901.SZ) is a China Health Care company (Medical Specialties) with a market value of $2.56B, the 1014th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥42.30 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 2.5%, against +2.0% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 12.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.5%); the operating margin is 25.5% (peer median 7.3%).

Valuation It trades at 25.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 31.5× (9th cheapest of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 18.7 points above its cost of capital (7.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 104002901.SZ 99
Six months, rebased to 100: Double Medical Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Double Medical Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥2.80BCN¥2.57BCN¥2.12BCN¥1.52BCN¥1.42B
Revenue growth—+21%+39%+8%—
Gross profitCN¥2.19BCN¥1.77BCN¥1.41BCN¥997MCN¥1.05B
EBITDAn/aCN¥806MCN¥546MCN¥202MCN¥168M
Net incomeCN¥646MCN¥600MCN¥357MCN¥59.0MCN¥92.6M
Free cash flowCN¥674MCN¥702MCN¥189M-CN¥220M-CN¥140M
Capital expenditureCN¥150MCN¥134MCN¥270MCN¥306MCN¥285M
Total debtCN¥306MCN¥316MCN¥385MCN¥599MCN¥69.2M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Double Medical Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%+40%NEOGEBOMOVE688029300529COTN2276METNIRTCATRCAXGNBONEXTMDXCELCESTA420369516033011066002901.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Double Medical Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×100×200×NEOGEBOMOVE300529EKTA-B2276METNIRTCATRCAXGNBONEXTMDX420369516033011066002901.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Double Medical Technology is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+25%+50%+75%0%50%EBO688029300529EKTA-B2276ATRCAXGNBONEXTMDX69516033011066002901.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Double Medical Technology is the large dot.

Double Medical Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (002901.SZ vs ZBH vs SYK vs 688161.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Double Medical Technology 002901.SZ$2.56B-3%+13%26%25.9×8.3%
Zimmer Biomet ZBH$20.1B+29%+7%16%12.0×-1.4%
Stryker SYK$124B+14%+8%25%20.4×10.6%
Shandong Weigao Orthopaedic Device 688161.SS$1.24B-25%-6%18%27.0×12.7%
Beijing Chunlizhengda Medical Instruments 1858.HK$671M-27%-9%31%9.2×-8.0%

How Double Medical Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Double Medical Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002901.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+6.8%+6.3%11th highest of 21
6-month return-2.5%+2.0%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-24.5%-32.2%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+12.8%+7.5%8th highest of 20
Operating margin25.5%7.3%3rd highest of 20
Forward P/E25.9×31.5×9th cheapest of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)8.3%12.8%6th least demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+10.4%+10.2%7th highest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.1 pp-2.0 pp7th least demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+18.7 pp-0.6 pp4th highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Double Medical Technology 002901.SZChina$2.56B-3%+13%26%25.9×8.3%+10.4%
Neogen NEOGUnited States$2.57B+30%0%0%34.6×n/an/a
EBOS EBO.AXAustralia$2.52B+1%+3%3%15.2×4.3%+6.8%
Medacta MOVE.SWSwitzerland$2.61B-21%+8%15%24.3×n/an/a
Micro-Tech (Nanjing) 688029.SSChina$2.46B+3%+6%18%29.0×12.8%+19.2%
Jafron Biomedical 300529.SZChina$2.46B+8%+1%37%25.4×6.9%+0.6%
Elekta EKTA-B.STSweden$2.37B+8%-7%6%15.1×10.0%+4.0%
COMET COTN.SWSwitzerland$2.84B-9%-3%6%34.0×n/an/a
Shanghai Conant Optical 2276.HKHong Kong$2.27B-27%+8%29%22.1×-1.6%+14.1%
Metall Zug METN.SWSwitzerland$2.25B+19%0%-10%139.2×n/an/a
iRhythm IRTCUnited States$2.97B-25%+26%1%182.6×n/an/a
AtriCure ATRCUnited States$2.98B+123%+14%3%220.7×55.7%+20.9%
Axogen AXGNUnited States$2.99B+19%+24%-5%76.5×48.8%+14.9%
Bonesupport BONEX.STSweden$2.16B+34%+25%25%61.9×13.3%+45.4%
TransMedics TMDXUnited States$3.06B+30%+26%12%48.5×35.6%+88.2%
Celcuity CELCUnited States$3.27B-49%n/an/an/an/an/a
Establishment Labs ESTAUnited States$2.00B-7%+38%-7%n/an/an/a
Sumitomo Bakelite 4203.TJapan$3.31B+15%+15%13%14.9×6.8%+8.9%
JEOL 6951.TJapan$1.98B-3%-18%11%14.2×21.3%+10.2%
Zhende Medical 603301.SSChina$3.33B-8%+8%7%43.5×23.2%-16.1%
Shandong Weigao Group Medical Polymer 1066.HKHong Kong$1.96B-4%+7%14%8.8×-11.8%+2.1%

Questions

Who are Double Medical Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Zimmer Biomet (ZBH), Stryker (SYK), Weigao Orthopaedic (688161.SS), Chunli Medical (1858.HK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Neogen (NEOG), EBOS (EBO.AX), Medacta (MOVE.SW), Micro-Tech (Nanjing) (688029.SS), Jafron Biomedical (300529.SZ), Elekta (EKTA-B.ST).
Is Double Medical Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 25.9× against a peer median of 31.5×, 9th cheapest of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Double Medical Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -2.5% against +2.0% for the median peer; over one year -18.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.