Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002664.SZ Xinzhi Group Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Xinzhi Group Co., Ltd. Class A002664.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Auto Parts: OEM
Momentum weak 27
Mkt cap
$839M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
66%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$13.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
54.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.9 pp
WACC 6.9%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
161 days
16 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥13.66
1D-2.9%
1W+1.3%
1M-3.3%
3M-15.5%
6M-32.1%
YTD-43.0%
1Y-54.1%
ATR %4.8%
52w lowhigh56.8% off high

What Xinzhi does

Employees: 6,378

Xinzhi at a glance

Size Xinzhi (002664.SZ) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Auto Parts: OEM) with a market value of $839M, the 2646th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥13.66 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 32.1%, against -21.2% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 15.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.5%); the operating margin is 1.7% (peer median 6.4%).

Valuation It trades at 54.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.6× (3rd most expensive of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.9 points below its cost of capital (6.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 78002664.SZ 67
Six months, rebased to 100: Xinzhi against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Xinzhi financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥6.92BCN¥6.10BCN¥5.91BCN¥4.61BCN¥3.71B
Revenue growth—+3%+28%+24%—
Gross profitCN¥979MCN¥618MCN¥451MCN¥594MCN¥396M
EBITDAn/aCN¥477MCN¥251MCN¥427MCN¥214M
Net incomeCN¥54.9MCN¥134MCN¥21.1MCN¥243MCN¥211M
Free cash flow-CN¥401M-CN¥390M-CN¥272M-CN¥388M-CN¥263M
Capital expenditureCN¥790MCN¥778MCN¥792MCN¥748MCN¥464M
Total debtCN¥6.31BCN¥5.64BCN¥5.46BCN¥4.43BCN¥3.94B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Xinzhi competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%6031973006807283516160329372206007426886670021013006957287603286300258001311603352002448AUTN000030SSWLPWH002664.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Xinzhi is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%0×100×200×60319730068072837220600742688667300695300258001311002448SSWLPWH002664.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Xinzhi is the large dot.

Xinzhi competitors and peer comparison

How Xinzhi compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Xinzhi against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002664.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-3.3%-1.3%10th lowest of 21
6-month return-32.1%-21.2%6th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-56.8%-40.7%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+15.6%+3.5%7th highest of 21
Operating margin1.7%6.4%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E54.6×15.6×3rd most expensive of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.9 pp-1.1 pp5th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Xinzhi 002664.SZChina$839M-32%+16%2%54.6×n/an/a
Shanghai Baolong Automotive 603197.SSChina$840M-23%+26%5%14.5×n/an/a
Wuxi Longsheng Technology 300680.SZChina$849M-37%+4%7%25.4×12.1%+35.6%
Aisan Industry 7283.TJapan$828M+18%+2%6%8.3×n/an/a
Nishikawa Rubber 5161.TJapan$852M+15%+3%8%n/a-2.9%+8.8%
Wuhu Atech Automotive 603293.SSChina$819M-39%+4%7%n/an/an/a
Musashi Seimitsu Industry 7220.TJapan$861M-52%+4%6%15.9×9.7%+11.1%
Changchun FAWAY Group Automobile Components 600742.SSChina$863M-18%-20%2%11.2×n/an/a
Wuhan Lincontrol Automotive Electronics 688667.SSChina$809M-31%-19%12%33.1×26.5%+9.4%
Guangdong Hongtu Technology (Holdings) 002101.SZChina$805M-19%-1%2%12.7×n/an/a
Zhejiang ZhaoFeng Mechanical & Electric 300695.SZChina$875M-6%+4%11%56.5×n/an/a
Nippon Seiki 7287.TJapan$800M-14%+6%4%11.9×-1.7%+8.6%
Jiangsu Riying Electronics 603286.SSChina$891M-22%+1%-5%n/an/an/a
Jiangsu Pacific Precision Forging 300258.SZChina$789M-20%-8%2%225.2×n/an/a
Chuzhou Duoli Automotive Technology 001311.SZChina$894M-36%+45%7%15.6×n/an/a
Chongqing Zhixin Industrial 603352.SSChina$787M-35%+22%26%n/an/an/a
ZYNP Corporation 002448.SZChina$896M-32%+26%13%10.8×-3.0%+16.9%
Autoneum AUTN.SWSwitzerland$896M+7%-1%6%11.7×-7.5%+5.6%
FAWER Automotive Parts 000030.SZChina$897M-28%-7%0%n/a4.9%+9.4%
Steel Strips Wheels SSWL.NSIndia$898M+153%+33%8%20.4×25.4%+24.3%
PWR PWH.AXAustralia$776M+24%+31%16%46.9×41.7%+16.6%

Questions

Which companies are Xinzhi's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Shanghai Baolong Automotive (603197.SS), Wuxi Longsheng Technology (300680.SZ), Aisan Industry (7283.T), Nishikawa Rubber (5161.T), Wuhu Atech Automotive (603293.SS), Musashi Seimitsu Industry (7220.T), Changchun FAWAY Group Automobile Components (600742.SS), Wuhan Lincontrol Automotive Electronics (688667.SS).
Is Xinzhi expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 54.6× against a peer median of 15.6×, 3rd most expensive of 16 in its peer set.
How has Xinzhi stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -32.1% against -21.2% for the median peer; over one year -54.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.