Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002233.SZ Guangdong Tapai Group Co., Ltd Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Guangdong Tapai Group Co., Ltd Class A002233.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Materials›Construction Materials

Guangdong cement producer majority owned by Anhui Conch, supplying South China's construction market.

Momentum leader 83
Mkt cap
$1.34B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
57%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$23.2M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
20.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.4 pp
WACC 5.9%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
130 days
16 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥7.70
1D-1.4%
1W+2.3%
1M+8.4%
3M+1.1%
6M-10.1%
YTD-14.5%
1Y-14.7%
ATR %3.3%
52w lowhigh25.5% off high

What Guangdong Tapai does

Guangdong cement producer majority owned by Anhui Conch, supplying South China's construction market.

Products and services

  • Cement

Customers

  • Construction contractors in Guangdong/South China

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Construction materials
  • Cement production

What could go right

  • South China infrastructure/construction demand

What could go wrong

  • Real-estate downturn
  • Cement overcapacity

Moat: none (scale). Regional commodity cement producer; scale and Conch-group backing are the main edge.

Headquarters: Guangdong, China · Employees: 1,660

Named competitors

Guangdong Tapai at a glance

Size Guangdong Tapai (002233.SZ) is a China Materials company (Construction Materials) with a market value of $1.34B, the 1814th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥7.70 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 10.1%, against -10.1% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 11th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 10.8% over the last twelve months (peer median -4.3%); the operating margin is 7.1% (peer median 10.6%).

Valuation It trades at 20.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.0× (4th most expensive of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -10%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.4 points above its cost of capital (5.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 89002233.SZ 88
Six months, rebased to 100: Guangdong Tapai against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Guangdong Tapai financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥3.80BCN¥4.09BCN¥4.26BCN¥5.51BCN¥6.02B
Revenue growth—-4%-23%-8%—
Gross profitCN¥1.17BCN¥821MCN¥772MCN¥1.29BCN¥869M
EBITDAn/aCN¥993MCN¥904MCN¥1.32BCN¥962M
Net incomeCN¥306MCN¥634MCN¥538MCN¥742MCN¥266M
Free cash flowCN¥706MCN¥572MCN¥471MCN¥892MCN¥231M
Capital expenditureCN¥377MCN¥343MCN¥522MCN¥452MCN¥454M
Total debtCN¥24.2MCN¥30.1MCN¥22.9MCN¥1.52MCN¥0

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Guangdong Tapai competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%0004016053182233CALT605006CPACLOMA5273BREE250460072052326019920006727821SRC300720000935002302002192002233.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Guangdong Tapai is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×2,000×6053182233605006CPACLOMABREE250452320006727821000935002233.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Guangdong Tapai is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%000401CALTCPACLOMA5273BREE250452326019920006727821SRC002192002233.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Guangdong Tapai is the large dot.

Guangdong Tapai competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (002233.SZ vs 600585.SS vs 600801.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Guangdong Tapai 002233.SZ$1.34B-10%-11%7%20.3×-15.3%
Anhui Conch Cement 600585.SS$13.9B-12%-8%4%19.4×-7.7%
Huaxin Building Materials 600801.SS$7.16B+28%+16%18%14.8×-10.9%

How Guangdong Tapai compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Guangdong Tapai against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002233.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+8.4%+0.1%4th highest of 21
6-month return-10.1%-10.1%11th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-25.5%-33.0%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-10.8%-4.3%6th lowest of 21
Operating margin7.1%10.6%7th lowest of 20
Forward P/E20.3×13.0×4th most expensive of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-15.3%4.9%least demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)-10.2%+7.7%lowest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-5.0 pp-9.6 pp8th most demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.4 pp-2.9 pp7th highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Guangdong Tapai 002233.SZChina$1.34B-10%-11%7%20.3×-15.3%-10.2%
BBMG Jidong Cement 000401.SZChina$1.35B-21%-8%n/an/a37.1%-7.0%
Fsilon Furnishing and Construction Materials 605318.SSChina$1.36B-29%-15%-5%3,613.5×n/an/a
West China Cement 2233.HKHong Kong$1.30B-29%-10%15%11.1×n/an/a
Caltagirone CALT.MIItaly$1.26B+1%+10%10%n/a0.9%+10.5%
Shandong Fiberglass 605006.SSChina$1.25B+10%+31%5%64.0×n/an/a
Cementos Pacasmayo SAA Sponsored ADR CPACUnited States$1.16B+20%+21%25%22.2×-9.8%+9.9%
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina SA Sponsored ADR LOMAUnited States$1.12B-21%-5%9%16.6×13.6%+2.9%
Mitani Sekisan 5273.TJapan$1.12B+33%+9%18%n/a-8.4%+7.7%
Breedon BREE.LUnited Kingdom$1.60B+17%+8%7%12.2×10.1%+13.0%
Goldsun Building Materials 2504.TWTaiwan$1.06B-14%-3%22%8.4×-7.1%+3.6%
CCCC Design And Consulting 600720.SSChina$1.73B-24%-10%12%9.7×n/an/a
Sumitomo Osaka Cement 5232.TJapan$969M+49%+5%7%13.7×4.6%-1.3%
BBMG 601992.SSChina$1.86B-19%-25%-4%n/a41.4%-3.3%
Gansu Shangfeng Materials 000672.SZChina$1.88B-6%-23%7%4.5×10.2%-6.1%
Maeda Kosen 7821.TJapan$944M+21%+11%17%14.8×-4.7%+10.6%
SigmaRoc SRC.LUnited Kingdom$1.95B+14%+4%15%12.1×12.4%+52.8%
Hanilcmt 300720.KSSouth Korea$905M-4%-10%11%11.9×-3.2%+7.9%
Sichuan Hexie Shuangma 000935.SZChina$1.98B-35%-14%15%13.8×n/an/a
China West Construction 002302.SZChina$884M-16%-24%-7%n/a12.5%-5.0%
YOUNGY 002192.SZChina$2.03B-52%+315%60%n/a4.9%+16.8%

Questions

Who are Guangdong Tapai's main competitors?
Named competitors: Anhui Conch Cement (600585.SS), Huaxin Cement (600801.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes BBMG Jidong Cement (000401.SZ), Fsilon Furnishing and Construction Materials (605318.SS), West China Cement (2233.HK), Caltagirone (CALT.MI), Shandong Fiberglass (605006.SS), Cementos Pacasmayo SAA Sponsored ADR (CPAC).
Is Guangdong Tapai expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 20.3× against a peer median of 13.0×, 4th most expensive of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -10%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Guangdong Tapai stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -10.1% against -10.1% for the median peer; over one year -14.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.