Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 000037.SZ Shenzhen Nanshan Power Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shenzhen Nanshan Power Co., Ltd. Class A000037.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Utilities›Electric Utilities
Momentum neutral 49
Mkt cap
$527M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
55%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$14.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-5.3 pp
WACC 5.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥8.83
1D+1.7%
1W+10.7%
1M-3.9%
3M-12.4%
6M-18.2%
YTD+6.6%
1Y-3.2%
ATR %4.8%
52w lowhigh33.1% off high

What Shenzhen Nanshan Power does

Employees: 305

Shenzhen Nanshan Power at a glance

Size Shenzhen Nanshan Power (000037.SZ) is a China Utilities company (Electric Utilities) with a market value of $527M, the 3733rd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥8.83 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 18.2%, against -24.1% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 35.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.0%); the operating margin is -6.7% (peer median 3.9%).

Valuation It trades at 7.4× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.1× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.3 points below its cost of capital (5.3% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026000037.SZ 79Peer median 74
Six months, rebased to 100: Shenzhen Nanshan Power against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shenzhen Nanshan Power financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥474MCN¥401MCN¥442MCN¥589MCN¥694M
Revenue growth—-9%-25%-15%—
Gross profitCN¥142MCN¥73.4MCN¥8.65M-CN¥9.71M-CN¥126M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥22.0M-CN¥81.8M-CN¥47.1M-CN¥182M
Net incomeCN¥184MCN¥161MCN¥21.9MCN¥4.16M-CN¥160M
Free cash flow-CN¥84.6M-CN¥205M-CN¥48.4M-CN¥85.9MCN¥261M
Capital expenditureCN¥135MCN¥200MCN¥16.3MCN¥10.1MCN¥3.31M
Total debtCN¥406MCN¥372MCN¥275MCN¥404MCN¥1.06B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shenzhen Nanshan Power competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%605028600505ELMRA605162ADXHNRGGNE071320VLTSA000720AC5600969300982600101PTC6055800008623691002479000037.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shenzhen Nanshan Power is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%0×2.5×5×7.5×605028600505ELMRA605162ADXHNRGGNE071320VLTSA000720AC5600969300982600101PTC6055800008626009793691002479000037.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shenzhen Nanshan Power is the large dot.

Shenzhen Nanshan Power competitors and peer comparison

How Shenzhen Nanshan Power compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shenzhen Nanshan Power against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure000037.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-3.9%-9.4%7th highest of 21
6-month return-18.2%-24.1%8th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-33.1%-39.0%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+35.1%+4.0%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin-6.7%3.9%3rd lowest of 21
EV / Sales7.4×2.1×2nd most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-5.3 pp-0.3 pp4th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Shenzhen Nanshan Power 000037.SZChina$527M-18%+35%-7%7.4×n/an/a
Ningbo Shimao Energy 605028.SSChina$522M-21%0%36%9.4×9.5%+1.5%
Sichuan Xichang Electric Power 600505.SSChina$520M-31%-10%7%3.6×1.2%+9.5%
Elmera ELMRA.OLNorway$549M+43%+48%5%0.4×-15.6%+24.2%
Zhejiang Xinzhonggang Thermal Power 605162.SSChina$556M-25%-5%19%4.6×0.8%+4.4%
Audax Renovables ADX.MCSpain$564M-21%-8%4%0.5×n/an/a
Hallador Energy HNRGUnited States$476M-46%+8%2%1.1×n/an/a
Genie Energy GNEUnited States$466M+23%+10%3%0.5×-3.6%+7.1%
KDHC 071320.KSSouth Korea$601M-8%+1%15%1.2×-11.2%+13.8%
Voltalia VLTSA.PAFrance$602M-42%+19%12%4.4×n/an/a
Shandong Xinneng Taishan Power Generation 000720.SZChina$602M-28%+8%-39%4.2×n/an/a
Acinque AC5.MIItaly$460M-6%-11%3%1.1×12.8%+9.3%
Hunan Chendian International Development 600969.SSChina$453M-18%+4%3%2.2×0.2%+6.4%
Suwen Electric Energy Technology 300982.SZChina$448M-41%-55%-13%2.5×n/an/a
Sichuan Mingxing Electric Power 600101.SSChina$620M-23%+2%6%1.1×n/an/a
PTC India PTC.NSIndia$437M-39%+13%4%0.2×-18.2%-1.4%
Hengsheng Energy 605580.SSChina$653M-28%+30%19%4.5×15.7%+14.1%
Ning Xia Yin Xing Energy 000862.SZChina$665M-25%-8%0%4.3×-1.4%+1.7%
Sichuan Guangan AAA Public 600979.SSChina$670M-28%+4%-5%3.0×n/an/a
Giga Solar Materials 3691.TWOTaiwan$403M0%+88%2%2.1×n/an/a
Zhejiang Fuchunjiang Environmental Thermoelectric 002479.SZChina$704M-2%+26%9%1.0×-10.7%+2.9%

Questions

Which companies are Shenzhen Nanshan Power's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Ningbo Shimao Energy (605028.SS), Sichuan Xichang Electric Power (600505.SS), Elmera (ELMRA.OL), Zhejiang Xinzhonggang Thermal Power (605162.SS), Audax Renovables (ADX.MC), Hallador Energy (HNRG), Genie Energy (GNE), KDHC (071320.KS).
Is Shenzhen Nanshan Power expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 7.4× against a peer median of 2.1×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Shenzhen Nanshan Power stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -18.2% against -24.1% for the median peer; over one year -3.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.